RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay

> -----Original Message-----
> From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: 18 October 2002 07:31
> To: Jean-Jacques Moreau
> Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Jacek Kopecky; Martin Gudgin; 
> XMLP Dist App
> Subject: Re: Proposal for new last call issue: Some 
> unprocessed headers should stay
> 
> 
> Jean-Jacques (and Gudge):  I like this table a lot, and I think the 
> "assumed" column adds greatly to its value.  

I agree.

> Regardless of 
> what we think 
> of the merits of the proposal, this table helps to make clear 
> exactly what 
> the proposal is, and that surely helps the discussion.  I suggest we 
> document competing proposals (including the status quo)  in 
> similar form. 

Sounds like a great idea to me. Is the status quo the table below sans
relay?

> Depending on what we finally decide we want, it might be 
> worth using a 
> table of this sort in the actual recommendation.  

I think that's a great idea.

Gudge