I would tend to agree with you (and, to be honest, this is the part of the proposal I am hesitant about). However: 1) we should try to solve the indicated scenario without going back to WD; 2) the notion of role is already blurred with that of routing ("SOAP roles MAY be named with a URI useable to route SOAP messages to an appropriate SOAP node."), so the situation may not be worse after that change (not a perfect reason, though). Are you suggesting we should use "relayIfNotProcessed" instead? Is that a go-back-to-WD solution? (Yves?) Jean-Jacques. Jacek Kopecky wrote: > I really think that the questions of relay and of role targeting are > orthogonal.Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 10:12:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:21 UTC