Re: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay

I would tend to agree with you (and, to be honest, this is the 
part of the proposal I am hesitant about). However:

1) we should try to solve the indicated scenario without going 
back to WD;

2) the notion of role is already blurred with that of routing 
("SOAP roles MAY be named with a URI useable to route SOAP 
messages to an appropriate SOAP node."), so the situation may not 
be worse after that change (not a perfect reason, though).

Are you suggesting we should use "relayIfNotProcessed" instead? 
Is that a go-back-to-WD solution? (Yves?)

Jean-Jacques.

Jacek Kopecky wrote:
> I really think that the questions of relay and of role targeting are
> orthogonal.