- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:26:09 -0400
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Graham Kline writes: >> I agree that this is an important use-case (e.g. for >> diagnostic tracing) and that the proposed solution >> looks reasonable. Good, thank you! >> Question: does the proposed new "relay" role apply >> to the final recipient? The name suggests not, but >> the description suggests that it can. Right. The proposal clearly says: "We propose one new builtin role to be called: http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/relay . In most respects, this role would be like any other. Any intermediary or ultimate receiver MAY choose to assume this role. " Yes, the ultimate receiver has to be able to play this role. If the name is for any reason misleading I'm sure the WG can stage one of its "name the role" contests. Thanks! ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2002 11:29:31 UTC