W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:26:09 -0400
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFF2C50DB7.E6720CB8-ON85256C53.004A41D7@lotus.com>

Graham Kline writes:

>> I agree that this is an important use-case (e.g. for 
>> diagnostic tracing) and that the proposed solution 
>> looks reasonable.

Good, thank you!

>> Question:  does the proposed new "relay" role apply 
>> to the final recipient?  The name suggests not, but 
>> the description suggests that it can.

Right. The proposal clearly says:

"We propose one new builtin role to be called:
http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/relay .  In most
respects, this role would be like any other.  Any intermediary or
ultimate receiver MAY choose to assume this role.  "

Yes, the ultimate receiver has to be able to play this role.  If the name 
is for any reason misleading I'm sure the WG can stage one of its "name 
the role" contests.  Thanks!

Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2002 11:29:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:21 UTC