W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > October 2002

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed header s should stay

From: Nilo Mitra (EUS) <Nilo.Mitra@am1.ericsson.se>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:10:50 -0500
Message-ID: <C358DED30DFED41192E100508BB3922704102D36@eamrcnt716.exu.ericsson.se>
To: "'Henrik Frystyk Nielsen'" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Cc: XMLP Dist App <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

> For example, having ignored header blocks be preserved would not 
> allow me to
> deploy an optional hop-by-hop compression algorithm.

Can you explain why not? I'm struggling to understand this, not challenging the statement.
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 15:10:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:21 UTC