W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > October 2002

RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:03:19 -0700
Message-ID: <5C39F806F9939046B4B1AFE652500A3A034B2B29@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "XMLP Dist App" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Cc: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>, "Noah Mendelsohn" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>

I agree that such a table would be a great addition to the spec.

From a purely editorial POW, I wonder whether a non-normative appendix
would be appropriate given that the exact rules are already elsewhere in
the spec. That way, we avoid the confusion of which version is "the one
that rules them all" :)


>Since this seem to be found of interest, here's a further update 
>with "mustUnderstand" added.
Received on Friday, 18 October 2002 14:03:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:21 UTC