www-ws-arch@w3.org from April 2003 by author

Abbie Barbir

• WSA Doc Security Section: Feedback needed (Thursday, 24 April)

Anne Thomas Manes

• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Sunday, 20 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Sunday, 20 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Sunday, 20 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Sunday, 20 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o f WS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow'scall) (Monday, 14 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Wednesday, 9 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call (Wednesday, 9 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Tuesday, 8 April)

Assaf Arkin

• Re: On why services may not have URIs (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: To be a Web service, or not to be a Web service ... (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o f WS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: To be a Web service, or not to be a Web service ... (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Stranger in a Strange Land (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: To be a Web service, or not to be a Web service ... (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope of WS A for the document (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: To be a Web service, or not to be a Web service ... (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Is This a Web Service? (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Fwd: Protocol independence (Friday, 4 April)

Bill de hÓra

• Re: Resolution of Web Services Architecture Issues 27 and 28 (Thursday, 3 April)

Burdett, David

• RE: Stranger in a Strange Land (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)

Champion, Mike

• RE: There is no spoon Neo (Tuesday, 29 April)
• OffTopic -- Always look on the sunny side .... (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Plan B: What are the fundamental contraints on the services in-sc ope for WSA? (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• SOAP/WSDL version numbers (Friday, 18 April)
• Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• Harvesting wisdom from the mailing list (was RE: Stranger in a St range Land (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o f WS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o f WS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Stranger in a Strange Land (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o f WS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o f WS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope of WS A for the document (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: To be a Web service, or not to be a Web service ... (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: To be a Web service, or not to be a Web service ... (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Interoperability and Fragmentation (Wednesday, 16 April)
• To be a Web service, or not to be a Web service ... (Wednesday, 16 April)
• What DO we agree on? (was RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discuss ion topic for tomorrow's call) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• What does "Web service" mean [please don't run away screaming] ( was RE: Is This a Web Service?) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Protocol independence (Tuesday, 8 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's ca ll) (Monday, 7 April)
• RE: Protocol independence (Friday, 4 April)
• RE: Resolution of Web Services Architecture Issues 27 and 28 (Friday, 4 April)
• RE: Resolution of Web Services Architecture Issues 27 and 28 (Friday, 4 April)
• RE: Resolution of Web Services Architecture Issues 27 and 28 (Thursday, 3 April)
• RE: Resolution of Web Services Architecture Issues 27 and 28 (Thursday, 3 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's ca ll) (Thursday, 3 April)
• The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Thursday, 3 April)
• Resolution of Web Services Architecture Issues 27 and 28 (Thursday, 3 April)
• FW: OWL Web Ontology Language Last Call Documents -- request for reviews (Wednesday, 2 April)
• FW: OWL Web Ontology Language Last Call Documents -- request for reviews (Wednesday, 2 April)

Christopher B Ferris

• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Stranger in a Strange Land (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: To be a Web service, or not to be a Web service ... (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o f WS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o f WS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Stranger in a Strange Land (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: What DO we agree on? (was RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discuss ion topic for tomorrow's call) (Wednesday, 16 April)

Colleen Evans

• Re: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)

Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)

• RE: Draft of the Web Services Glossary (reliable messaging) (Wednesday, 30 April)
• RE: Draft of the Web Services Glossary (Wednesday, 30 April)
• WS Definition (Monday, 28 April)
• RE: Message Reliability Text (Friday, 25 April)
• RE: Message Reliability Text (Friday, 25 April)
• Message Reliability Text (Friday, 25 April)
• Stack Diagram - An Analysis and Proposal (Friday, 25 April)
• RE: Plan B: fundamental contraints and scope (Tuesday, 22 April)
• RE: Plan B: fundamental contraints and scope (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: Plan B: fundamental contraints and scope (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: Plan B: What are the fundamental contraints on the services in-sc ope for WSA? (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o f WS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope of WS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Stranger in a Strange Land (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Stranger in a Strange Land (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Stranger in a Strange Land (Thursday, 17 April)
• Stranger in a Strange Land (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope of WS A for the document (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: What DO we agree on? (was RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discuss ion topic for tomorrow's call) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: To be a Web service, or not to be a Web service ... (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: To be a Web service, or not to be a Web service ... (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: What DO we agree on? (was RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discuss ion topic for tomorrow's call) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Interoperability and Fragmentation (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: RE : Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Monday, 14 April)
• Is This a Web Service? (Monday, 14 April)
• RE: Resolution of Web Services Architecture Issues 27 and 28 (Friday, 4 April)
• RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call (Thursday, 3 April)

Daniel_Austin@grainger.com

• Re: On why services may not have URIs (Monday, 21 April)

Dave Hollander

• RE: On why services may not have URIs (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: On why services may not have URIs (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of Web Service (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: On why services may not have URIs (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: Plan B: fundamental contraints and scope (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: Plan B: fundamental contraints and scope (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Stranger in a Strange Land (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Stranger in a Strange Land (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: To be a Web service, or not to be a Web service ... (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: To be a Web service, or not to be a Web service ... (Wednesday, 16 April)

David Booth

• RE: Some proposed definitions of Web Service (Monday, 21 April)

David Orchard

• There is no spoon Neo (Thursday, 24 April)
• RE: On why services may not have URIs (Thursday, 24 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Saturday, 19 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Friday, 4 April)

Doug Bunting

• Re: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)

Edwin Khodabakchian

• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Monday, 14 April)

Fabian Weber

• search feature (Wednesday, 9 April)

Francis McCabe

• Re: Draft of the Web Services Glossary (reliable messaging) (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: Draft of the Web Services Glossary (reliable messaging) (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: There is no spoon Neo (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: There is no spoon Neo (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: There is no spoon Neo (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: On why services may not have URIs (Tuesday, 22 April)
• On why services may not have URIs (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: What does "Web service" mean [please don't run away screaming] ( was RE: Is This a Web Service?) (Thursday, 17 April)

Geoff Arnold

• Re: Is This a Web Service? (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Protocol independence (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Protocol independence (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Fwd: Protocol independence (Monday, 7 April)
• Fwd: Protocol independence (Friday, 4 April)

George Blanck

• FW: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call (Tuesday, 8 April)

Hao He

• RE: Stranger in a Strange Land (Thursday, 17 April)

Heather Kreger

• regrets for 04/03/2003 conf call (Thursday, 3 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Thursday, 3 April)

Hugo Haas

• Draft of the Web Services Glossary (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call (Wednesday, 2 April)

James M Snell

• Re: Is This a Web Service? (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Is This a Web Service? (Monday, 14 April)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: Stranger in a Strange Land (Thursday, 17 April)

Jeff Mischkinsky

• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Wednesday, 23 April)

Jim Webber

• RE: Stranger in a Strange Land (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope of WS A for the document (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)

John Crupi

• Re: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope of WS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)

Jon Dart

• Re: Draft of the Web Services Glossary (reliable messaging) (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: Draft of the Web Services Glossary (reliable messaging) (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: Message Reliability Text (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: On why services may not have URIs (Monday, 21 April)

JP Moresmau

• RE : Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)

Katia Sycara

• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Sunday, 20 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Sunday, 20 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow'scall) (Monday, 14 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Friday, 4 April)
• RE: Resolution of Web Services Architecture Issues 27 and 28 (Friday, 4 April)

M!ke Brumbelow

• Regrets for 4/03 conference call (Friday, 4 April)

Mario Jeckle

• Conference Announcement International Conference on Web Services 2003 Europe (Saturday, 19 April)
• Re: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Tuesday, 8 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Sunday, 6 April)
• Regrets (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call (Wednesday, 2 April)

Mark Baker

• Re: There is no spoon Neo (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: Plan B: fundamental contraints and scope (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: On why services may not have URIs (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope of WSA for the document (Saturday, 19 April)
• Re: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Saturday, 19 April)
• Re: Stranger in a Strange Land (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: To be a Web service, or not to be a Web service ... (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Interoperability and Fragmentation (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Protocol independence (Tuesday, 8 April)
• RE: Protocol independence (Tuesday, 8 April)
• RE: Protocol independence (Friday, 4 April)
• Protocol independance (Thursday, 3 April)
• RE: Resolution of Web Services Architecture Issues 27 and 28 (Thursday, 3 April)

Mark Potts

• RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call (Thursday, 3 April)

Martin Chapman

• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)

michael.mahan@nokia.com

• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Friday, 18 April)

Newcomer, Eric

• Updated stack diagram (Thursday, 24 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Thursday, 24 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Thursday, 24 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Thursday, 24 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Thursday, 24 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Sunday, 20 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Saturday, 19 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o f WS A for the document (Saturday, 19 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Stranger in a Strange Land (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o f WS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow'scall) (Monday, 14 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Wednesday, 9 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Wednesday, 9 April)
• RE: Protocol independence (Wednesday, 9 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call (Wednesday, 9 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Wednesday, 9 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Wednesday, 9 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Thursday, 3 April)
• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call) (Thursday, 3 April)
• RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call (Wednesday, 2 April)

Richard.Chennault@kp.org

• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)

Ricky Ho

• Re: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• Re: There is no spoon Neo (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: There is no spoon Neo (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: There is no spoon Neo (Monday, 28 April)

Savas Parastatidis

• RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call (Tuesday, 8 April)
• RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call (Wednesday, 2 April)

Ugo Corda

• RE: There is no spoon Neo (Monday, 28 April)
• RE: There is no spoon Neo (Monday, 28 April)
• RE: Message Reliability Text (Friday, 25 April)
• RE: Message Reliability Text (Friday, 25 April)
• RE: OffTopic -- Always look on the sunny side .... (Wednesday, 23 April)
• RE: Plan B: fundamental contraints and scope (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: Plan B: fundamental contraints and scope (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Is This a Web Service? (Monday, 14 April)
• RE: Protocol independence (Tuesday, 8 April)

Walden Mathews

• Re: On why services may not have URIs (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: On why services may not have URIs (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Some proposed definitions of "web service" based on the call toda y (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o f WS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o f WS A for the document (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Stranger in a Strange Land (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope of WS A for the document (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: To be a Web service, or not to be a Web service ... (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Is This a Web Service? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Is This a Web Service? (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Resolution of Web Services Architecture Issues 27 and 28 (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Resolution of Web Services Architecture Issues 27 and 28 (Friday, 4 April)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2003 19:07:48 UTC