- From: <Richard.Chennault@kp.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:57:13 -0700
- To: jim.webber@arjuna.com
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org, www-ws-arch-request@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 13:20:08 UTC
+1 to what Jim states.
To me a Web Service requires WSDL and XML. If WSDL and XML are not
involved then one could theorize that we have always had web-services once
CGI's were born.
Rregards,
_________________________________________________
Richard D. Chennault
Kaiser Permanente
"Jim Webber" <jim.webber@arjuna.com>
Sent by: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org
04/15/2003 08:23 AM
To: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>, <www-ws-arch-request@w3.org>
cc:
Subject: RE: Is This a Web Service?
Roger:
> Do other people think that if it doesn't use WSDL it's not a
> Web service? I personally don't like this at all.
Nor do I, but then I have the seemingly contrarian view that SOAP is
implicitly involved :-) (and not necessarily anything to do with the Web).
While I can appreciate that this group does not necessarily have to have a
commercially-facing outlook, we are at risk of marginalisation if the
architecture fragments into X different flavours of Web services.
Jim
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 13:20:08 UTC