- From: <Richard.Chennault@kp.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:57:13 -0700
- To: jim.webber@arjuna.com
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org, www-ws-arch-request@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 13:20:08 UTC
+1 to what Jim states. To me a Web Service requires WSDL and XML. If WSDL and XML are not involved then one could theorize that we have always had web-services once CGI's were born. Rregards, _________________________________________________ Richard D. Chennault Kaiser Permanente "Jim Webber" <jim.webber@arjuna.com> Sent by: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org 04/15/2003 08:23 AM To: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>, <www-ws-arch-request@w3.org> cc: Subject: RE: Is This a Web Service? Roger: > Do other people think that if it doesn't use WSDL it's not a > Web service? I personally don't like this at all. Nor do I, but then I have the seemingly contrarian view that SOAP is implicitly involved :-) (and not necessarily anything to do with the Web). While I can appreciate that this group does not necessarily have to have a commercially-facing outlook, we are at risk of marginalisation if the architecture fragments into X different flavours of Web services. Jim
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 13:20:08 UTC