- From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 13:02:41 -0700
- To: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 25 April 2003 16:02:47 UTC
Correction: "defining a Binding Framework" should of course be "defining a binding". -----Original Message----- From: Ugo Corda Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 11:22 AM To: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler); www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: RE: Message Reliability Text I think we should add something in the final part about the fact that the transport choice can affect the actual implementation. Something like: "WS-Reliability (...) and WS-ReliableMessaging (...) are example of acknowledgement infrastructure specifications that leverage the SOAP Extensibility Model. In cases where the underlying transport layer already provides reliable messaging support (e.g. a queue-based infrastructure), the same reliability Feature can be achieved in SOAP by defining a Binding Framework that relies on the underlying properties of the transport". Ugo
Received on Friday, 25 April 2003 16:02:47 UTC