- From: Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:59:31 -0700
- To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Sanjiva: Something like that. I do not pretend to know all the potential forms of a Web service. I certainly hope to be surprised! In addition to this loose association, there is a vast range of other kinds of Web service. My nose is acute for some kinds of short-cut `solutions' that I know will not meet the needs of people wanting to develop and use Web services. Frank On Monday, April 28, 2003, at 12:21 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > Hi Frank, > > Ah ok .. so if I undertand you correctly then you're identifying > the need for something like the UML association concept right? > That is, a way to indicate that related to this particular endpoint > there's another endpoint that is say its management interface > and so on. So a "service" become a set of endpoints .. some of > which implement the business interface of the service and others > which do various other things (and presumably implementing different > business interfaces). > > Sanjiva. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Francis McCabe" <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com> > To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> > Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org> > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 1:37 PM > Subject: Re: There is no spoon Neo > > >> >> Identifying Web service with a single entrypoint is fine; except that >> in the real world most people consider a Web service to denote a >> related set of entrypoints. (My terminology: to avoid getting into >> semantics). >> >> I.e., most people will need to describe/manage/deal with sets of these >> things in a coherent way. This is precisely what the concept of a >> composite web service is targeted at. >> >> If you restrict the concept of Web service to the single entrypoint >> case, you `solve' one problem (what is meant by a Web service's URI >> for >> example) but leave unanswered the larger scale issues. >> >> Frank >> >> On Monday, April 28, 2003, at 10:22 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: >> >>> "Francis McCabe" <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com> writes: >>>> >>>> This proposal is only going to fly technically if we also grasp the >>>> composite service nettle. >>> >>> I'm sorry but I don't understand; can you elaborate please? >>> >>> Sanjiva. >>> >>> >
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2003 11:59:38 UTC