Telecon 25th April ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com (Friday, 26 April)
REGRETS: 4/25 Lassila Ora (NRC/Boston) (Thursday, 25 April)
LANG: owl:quote Smith, Michael K (Wednesday, 24 April)
regrets april 25 telecon herman.ter.horst@philips.com (Wednesday, 24 April)
- Re: ACTION: task force unasserted triples Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 23 April)
- RE: ACTION: task force unasserted triples Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 23 April)
- Re: ACTION: task force unasserted triples Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 23 April)
- Re: ACTION: task force unasserted triples Jos De_Roo (Wednesday, 24 April)
- Re: ACTION: task force unasserted triples jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Wednesday, 24 April)
- RE: ACTION: task force unasserted triples Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 24 April)
- Re: ACTION: task force unasserted triples jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Wednesday, 24 April)
- Re: ACTION: task force unasserted triples Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 25 April)
- RE: ACTION: task force unasserted triples Smith, Michael K (Thursday, 25 April)
SEM: Layering Smith, Michael K (Friday, 19 April)
- Re: TEST, SEM: test cases for dark triples Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: TEST, SEM: test cases for dark triples Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: TEST, SEM: test cases for dark triples jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: TEST, SEM: test cases for dark triples jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Tuesday, 23 April)
- Re: TEST, SEM: test cases for dark triples Jos De_Roo (Tuesday, 23 April)
- Re: TEST, SEM: test cases for dark triples Jos De_Roo (Tuesday, 23 April)
- Re: TEST, SEM: test cases for dark triples jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: TEST, SEM: test cases for dark triples jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Saturday, 27 April)
- Re: TEST, SEM: test cases for dark triples jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Monday, 29 April)
- Re: SEM: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Pat Hayes (Saturday, 20 April)
- Re: SEM: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: SEM: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Dan Connolly (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: SEM: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Jonathan Borden (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: SEM: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Jonathan Borden (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: SEM: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Dan Connolly (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: SEM: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Jonathan Borden (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: SEM: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Dan Connolly (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: SEM: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Jonathan Borden (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: SEM: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Dan Connolly (Monday, 22 April)
- SEM: circular primitive vs. defined was Re: was: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Jonathan Borden (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: SEM: circular primitive vs. defined was Re: was: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Dan Connolly (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: SEM: circular primitive vs. defined was Re: was: comprehensiveentailments without dark triples Jonathan Borden (Monday, 22 April)
- RE: SEM: circular primitive Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 23 April)
- RE: SEM: circular primitive Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 23 April)
- RE: SEM: circular primitive Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 23 April)
- RE: SEM: circular primitive Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 23 April)
- RE: SEM: circular primitive Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 23 April)
- RE: SEM: circular primitive Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 23 April)
- RE: SEM: circular primitive Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 23 April)
- RE: SEM: circular primitive Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 23 April)
- RE: SEM: circular primitive Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 23 April)
- Re: SEM: circular primitive vs. defined was Re: was: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 23 April)
- Re: SEM: circular primitive vs. defined was Re: was: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Ian Horrocks (Tuesday, 23 April)
- Re: SEM: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 24 April)
- Re: SEM: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Jonathan Borden (Wednesday, 24 April)
RE: SEM: comprehensive entailments without dark triples Jeremy Carroll (Monday, 22 April)
ADMIN: Jim Hendler (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Re: ADMIN: Deborah McGuinness (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Re: ADMIN: Frank van Harmelen (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Re: ADMIN: herman.ter.horst@philips.com (Thursday, 18 April)
- RE: ADMIN: Stephen Buswell (Thursday, 18 April)
- RE: ADMIN: Dieter Fensel (Thursday, 18 April)
- RE: ADMIN: Said Tabet (Thursday, 18 April)
- Re: ADMIN: Jeff Heflin (Thursday, 18 April)
- Re: David Trastour (Thursday, 18 April)
Exhange langauge Jeremy Carroll (Thursday, 11 April)
Ontology Naming Smith, Michael K (Thursday, 4 April)
- Re: SUO: Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? John F. Sowa (Monday, 1 April)
- Re: SUO: Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? Frank van Harmelen (Monday, 1 April)
- Re: SUO: Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? Bill Andersen (Monday, 1 April)
- Program Semantics: available ontologies, taxonomies AND logics? David Sallach (Monday, 1 April)
Last message date: Tuesday, 30 April 2002 22:31:06 UTC