- From: <ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 16:42:10 +0200
- To: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
I fully support Ziv's suggestion: a well defined extension capability for OWL is very important for many appliaction we have in mind. For instance those kinds of constraints described about 10 years ago by Baader and Hanschke as so called "concrete domains" - i.e., arithmetic constraints, finite domain constraints, etc. Ruediger _________________________________________________ Here is a subject that has been on my mind but has received no broad consideration yet: just about all would agree that OWL (or whatever it is to be called) should be extensible. But can we begin consideration of defining parameters/mechanisms of what such extensibility will mean and how it might work? -- Ziv
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2002 10:42:55 UTC