- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 24 Apr 2002 10:11:35 -0500
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
TITLE: uniform treatment of literal/data values DESCRIPTION: The DAML+OIL specs separate the domain of discourse into datatype values and individuals, and require ontology designers to designate whether properties take datatype values or individuals. As a result, interesting features like UniqueProperty can't be used for properties that take string/date/integer values. Another result of this design is the distinction between rdfs:Class and daml:Class, about which users have asked for clarification. RAISED BY: Dan Connolly REFERENCE: * Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) Dan Connolly (Thu, Mar 21 2002) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Mar/0241.html * Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (sameState TEST) Dan Connolly (Tue, Apr 23 2002) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Apr/0261.html Re: rdfs:Class vs. daml:Class ? From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org) Date: Fri, Mar 29 2002 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2002Mar/0040.html TEST CASE: This inference isn't valid per the current DAML+OIL specs; I suggest it should be. http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/sameStateP.rdf http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/sameStateC.rdf This message is intended to follow: RE: ISSUES - how to submit From: Smith, Michael K (michael.smith@eds.com) Date: Fri, Apr 19 2002 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Apr/0197.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 11:40:10 UTC