- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 16:50:10 +0100
- To: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
I think we (test focus area) should propose test cases to be approved by the WG as a record of the f2f decisions. I suggest: - error cases of OWL documents using the Q keywords from DAML+OIL. i.e. the documents are not legal OWL documents - entailment tests with the Student and Employee example showing the desired entailements (see my message to RDF Core [1] including the D+O entailment tests). Also one of the extra entailments Pat wants. I suggest we do these tests by: 1: Writing these tests in DAML+OIL 2: globally substitute the namespace prefix daml: for owl: 3: move the actual namespace "http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil#" into an external entity (named owl). 4: add comments to the tests giving the intent of the tests, and indicating that future editorial revision will be made to update the tests in line with any deviation of OWL from DAML+OIL. I note that the tests will then *actually* all be false, since the only namespace we have is the d+o one, and as far as I can tell, d+o disagrees with WebOnt on all of these issues. However the intent will be clear - that OWL will conform with the tests. Jeremy [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0178.html
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2002 11:51:56 UTC