- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:40:00 +0100
- To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
> I was thinking that the OWL MT would have the normative definition of an > owl:List. > Yes - I am sufficiently perverse to regard the language used in a MT as "English". > > > > It's just I find it an odd exception if we cannot use OWL to say things > > that it is clearly capable of saying about other things, when we are > trying > > to build a description of itself, such as daml:first being a > > UniqueProperty. i.e. my position is having normatively bootstrapped in > > English, that OWL is then capable of describing some aspects of itself. > > > > I agree, but that is an entirely different issue (one that I think was > prematurely closed - btw) > Which issue? closed? Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 10:40:17 UTC