RE: SEM: circular primitive

From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Subject: RE: SEM: circular primitive 
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:20:10 +0100

[...]

> > Please point me to this dark triples proposal -- the one that
> > explains how they work. I'm pretty sure there isn't one,
> > and I've done quite a bit of looking (and phoning people,
> > and so on.)
> > 
> 
> I have been making efforts to put up proposals that have enough detail 
> so that they can be knocked down. I, like Dan, do not find the dark
> triples proposal having that level of detail.

Here is *one* quick proposal.

Take the proposal by Ian, Frank, and myself.  Provide any triple syntax for
the definitions.  Make all such triples dark.  Use the standard RDF syntax
for the facts.  Make all such triples non-dark.  Use the semantics provided
for the definition triples.


peter

Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2002 05:41:34 UTC