- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 05:39:40 -0400
- To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: connolly@w3.org, jonathan@openhealth.org, www-webont-wg@w3.org
From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Subject: RE: SEM: circular primitive Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:20:10 +0100 [...] > > Please point me to this dark triples proposal -- the one that > > explains how they work. I'm pretty sure there isn't one, > > and I've done quite a bit of looking (and phoning people, > > and so on.) > > > > I have been making efforts to put up proposals that have enough detail > so that they can be knocked down. I, like Dan, do not find the dark > triples proposal having that level of detail. Here is *one* quick proposal. Take the proposal by Ian, Frank, and myself. Provide any triple syntax for the definitions. Make all such triples dark. Use the standard RDF syntax for the facts. Make all such triples non-dark. Use the semantics provided for the definition triples. peter
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2002 05:41:34 UTC