- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 14:23:43 -0500
- To: "Jeff Heflin" <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>, "Ian Horrocks" <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Jeff Heflin wrote:
>
> Yes, that is basically what I mean. In an earlier message [1], I gave
> some examples of what an XML syntax for WebOnt might look like. One
> example from that message was:
>
> <!-- This says that a trio has three members, all of whom are musicians.
> -->
> <owl:class ID="Trio">
> <owl:hasProperty ref="#hasMember">
> <owl:cardinality value="3" />
> <owl:allvalues>
> <owl:class ref="#Musician" />
> </owl:allvalues>
> </owl:hasProperty>
> </owl:class>
but in something RDF compatible:
<Class rdf:ID="Trio">
<subClassOf>
<Restriction>
<onProperty rdf:resource="#hasMember"/>
<cardinality>3</cardinality>
<rdf:range rdf:resource="#Musician"/>
</Restriction>
</subClassOf>
</Class>
which, gosh, isn't all that different, is it?
Jonathan
Received on Friday, 5 April 2002 14:27:15 UTC