- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 14:23:43 -0500
- To: "Jeff Heflin" <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>, "Ian Horrocks" <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Jeff Heflin wrote: > > Yes, that is basically what I mean. In an earlier message [1], I gave > some examples of what an XML syntax for WebOnt might look like. One > example from that message was: > > <!-- This says that a trio has three members, all of whom are musicians. > --> > <owl:class ID="Trio"> > <owl:hasProperty ref="#hasMember"> > <owl:cardinality value="3" /> > <owl:allvalues> > <owl:class ref="#Musician" /> > </owl:allvalues> > </owl:hasProperty> > </owl:class> but in something RDF compatible: <Class rdf:ID="Trio"> <subClassOf> <Restriction> <onProperty rdf:resource="#hasMember"/> <cardinality>3</cardinality> <rdf:range rdf:resource="#Musician"/> </Restriction> </subClassOf> </Class> which, gosh, isn't all that different, is it? Jonathan
Received on Friday, 5 April 2002 14:27:15 UTC