- From: Leo Obrst <lobrst@mitre.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 09:01:54 -0500
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
- CC: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Guus, I think this is a very useful beginning for the GUIDE group. UML is probably known by many more people who are prospective developers and users of OWL* (or whatever the language will be called) and showing a rough translation between OWL* and UML is important. In your document, I also see placeholders for limitations, etc., and I consider these important too: the lack of a formalized semantics for UML, for example, though that may be changing. What will OWL* give you that UML (or any other language) cannot? Leo Guus Schreiber wrote: > > As input for the GUIDE focus area I've written a short note on how to > represent the > frame part of OWL in UML. See: > > http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/docs/owl-uml/owl-uml.html > > Feedback is very welcome, both on the content and on whether this type > of exercise is of use for the WG. > > Guus > > -- > A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 15 > NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Tel: +31 20 525 6793 > Fax: +31 20 525 6896; E-mail: schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl > WWW: http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.html -- _____________________________________________ Dr. Leo Obrst The MITRE Corporation mailto:lobrst@mitre.org Intelligent Information Management/Exploitation Voice: 703-883-6770 7515 Colshire Drive, M/S W640 Fax: 703-883-1379 McLean, VA 22102-7508, USA
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2002 09:01:17 UTC