www-tag@w3.org from November 2002 by author

Aaron Swartz

• Re: Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML) (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML) (Friday, 1 November)

Anthony B. Coates

• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Wednesday, 13 November)

Bill de hÓra

• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Tuesday, 12 November)

Brian McBride

• Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal (Wednesday, 13 November)

Bullard, Claude L (Len)

• RE: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Monday, 25 November)

by way of Joseph Reagle

• Re: binary XML (Tuesday, 26 November)

Chris Lilley

• Re: Let's get some principles nailed down (Friday, 29 November)
• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Friday, 29 November)
• Re: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI (Friday, 29 November)
• Re: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI (Friday, 29 November)
• Re: Generic link handling (Friday, 29 November)
• Re: My action on namespaces (Tuesday, 12 November)

Dan Connolly

• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Monday, 25 November)
• rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6 affects WSDL too (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: [Agenda] 25 Nov 2002 TAG teleconf (xlinkScope-23, URIEquivalence-15, namespaceDocument-8) (Wednesday, 20 November)

Dare Obasanjo

• RE: Let's get some principles nailed down (Friday, 22 November)
• RE: Let's get some principles nailed down (Friday, 22 November)
• RE: proposed TAG issue: future web architecture (Wednesday, 20 November)

Dave Beckett

• Re: RDDL: Here is some 'real' RDF was: Re: minor RDF tax (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: RDF/XML (was Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF) (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal (Tuesday, 12 November)
• RDF/XML (was Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF) (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Monday, 11 November)

David Orchard

• RE: Posted draft of URI comparison finding (Friday, 29 November)
• RE: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Tuesday, 26 November)
• RE: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Tuesday, 26 November)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: RDDL: Here is some 'real' RDF was: Re: minor RDF tax (Friday, 22 November)

Graham Klyne

• Re: minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML) (Friday, 1 November)

Hurley, Oisin

• RE: Cool titles don't change (Thursday, 28 November)

Ian B. Jacobs

• [Minutes] 25 Nov 2002 TAG teleconf (Action item review) (Monday, 25 November)
• TAG election started; nomination period until 23 Dec 2002 (Monday, 25 November)
• [Minutes] 18 Nov 2002 TAG ftf meeting (Monday, 25 November)
• A few comments on "Guidelines for the use of XML within IETF Protocols" (Friday, 22 November)
• [Agenda] 25 Nov 2002 TAG teleconf (xlinkScope-23, URIEquivalence-15, namespaceDocument-8) (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: xlinkScope-23 & RDF (Tuesday, 19 November)
• [Publication] 15 Nov 2002 Architecture Document (Friday, 15 November)
• Archive approval system for this list (Wednesday, 13 November)
• [Publication] 12 Nov 2002 Architecture Document (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: [Publication] 29 Oct 2002 Arch Doc (Tuesday, 12 November)
• [Minutes] 11 Nov 2002 TAG teleconf (IRIEverywhere-27, Arch Doc, xlinkScope-23) (Monday, 11 November)
• [Publication] 7 Nov 2002 draft of Architecture Document (Friday, 8 November)
• Summary of TAG activity from 5 Oct 2002 to 4 Nov 2002 (Thursday, 7 November)
• [Agenda] 11 Nov 2002 TAG teleconference (Thursday, 7 November)
• Findings versioning policy (Monday, 4 November)
• [Issue fragmentInXML-28] Use of fragment identifiers in XML (Monday, 4 November)
• [Minutes] 4 Nov 2002 TAG teleconf (query/schema consistency, fragments in XML, Arch Doc) (Monday, 4 November)

Jeremy Carroll

• RE: IRI-Everywhere (Monday, 25 November)
• xlinkScope-23 & RDF (Tuesday, 19 November)
• IRI-Everywhere (Tuesday, 12 November)

Jonathan Borden

• Re: minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF (Tuesday, 19 November)
• RDDL: Here is some 'real' RDF was: Re: minor RDF tax (Sunday, 17 November)
• Re: minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF (Sunday, 17 November)
• RDDL/RDF new proposal (Sunday, 17 November)
• Re: minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF (Sunday, 17 November)
• minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF (Sunday, 17 November)
• Re: RDDL/RDF (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Wednesday, 13 November)
• what should RDDL/RDF look like? (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Determining what a URI identifies (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Arch Doc: was Re: Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML) (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML) (Friday, 1 November)

Julian Reschke

• RE: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI (Friday, 29 November)
• RE: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI (Thursday, 28 November)
• RE: Opacity and resource metadata (was Re: proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata (Wednesday, 27 November)
• RE: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: IRI-Everywhere (Friday, 22 November)
• RE: IRI-Everywhere (Wednesday, 20 November)
• RE: IRI-Everywhere (Saturday, 16 November)
• RE: IRI-Everywhere (Wednesday, 13 November)

Larry Masinter

• RE: Determining what a URI identifies (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: Determining what a URI identifies (Monday, 4 November)

Mark Baker

• Re: Opacity and resource metadata (was Re: proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Opacity and resource metadata (was Re: proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata (Tuesday, 26 November)
• REST Interaction principles (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Determining what a URI identifies (Monday, 4 November)
• Determining what a URI identifies (Sunday, 3 November)
• Re: [Publication] 29 Oct 2002 Arch Doc (Friday, 1 November)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Monday, 25 November)

Martin Duerst

• Fwd: IAB discussions & IRIs (Monday, 25 November)
• Fwd: RE: IAB discussions & IRIs (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: IRI-Everywhere (Monday, 18 November)
• Announcing draft-duerst-iri-02.txt (Friday, 15 November)
• RE: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces) (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces) (Friday, 1 November)

Michael Day

• Re: Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML) (Friday, 1 November)

Mike Champion

• [www-tag] <none> (Friday, 22 November)
• XML protocols principles (was Re: Let's get some principles nailed down) (Monday, 18 November)

Miles Sabin

• Re: Let's make sure we've got nails and not screws... (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Let's get some principles nailed down (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Let's get some principles nailed down (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Let's get some principles nailed down (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: My action on namespaces (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: My action on namespaces (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: My action on namespaces (Monday, 11 November)

Misha Wolf

• RE: Namespaces 1.1 Last Call -- I18N WG comments (Friday, 29 November)
• RE: Posted draft of URI comparison finding (Friday, 29 November)
• Cool titles don't change (Wednesday, 27 November)
• draft-duerst-iri-02 published (Wednesday, 13 November)
• RE: Namespaces 1.1 Last Call -- I18N WG comments (Wednesday, 13 November)
• RE: Namespaces 1.1 Last Call -- I18N WG comments (Wednesday, 13 November)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Let's get some principles nailed down (Friday, 22 November)
• RE: Let's get some principles nailed down (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Let's get some principles nailed down (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Determining what a URI identifies (Wednesday, 6 November)

Norman Walsh

• Re: My action on namespaces (Monday, 25 November)
• My action on namespaces (Monday, 11 November)

Ossi Nykänen

• Re: Opacity and resource metadata (was Re: proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata (Tuesday, 26 November)
• proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata (Monday, 25 November)

pat hayes

• Re: Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML) (Friday, 1 November)

Patrick Stickler

• Re: Let's make sure we've got nails and not screws... (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Let's get some principles nailed down (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Let's make sure we've got nails and not screws... (Re: Let's get some principles nailed down) (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Another RDDL/RDF proposal (Wednesday, 13 November)

Paul Cotton

• RE: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI (Friday, 29 November)
• RE: Posted draft of URI comparison finding (Friday, 29 November)

Paul Grosso

• RE: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI (Friday, 29 November)
• RE: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Monday, 25 November)
• SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Monday, 25 November)

Paul Prescod

• Generic link handling (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Updated SOAP HTTP GET binding document (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Let's get some principles nailed down (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Let's get some principles nailed down (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Let's get some principles nailed down (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: RDF in XHTML (Thursday, 14 November)
• RDF and mixed content (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: My action on namespaces (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: RDF/XML (was Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF) (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: My action on namespaces (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: My action on namespaces (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Another RDDL/RDF proposal (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: [Issue fragmentInXML-28] Use of fragment identifiers in XML (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Determining what a URI identifies (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: Determining what a URI identifies (Monday, 4 November)

Ramesh Arunsalam

• RE: Updated SOAP HTTP GET binding document (Tuesday, 26 November)

Richard Tobin

• RE: Namespaces 1.1 Last Call -- I18N WG comments (Friday, 29 November)
• RE: Posted draft of URI comparison finding (Friday, 29 November)
• RE: Posted draft of URI comparison finding (Friday, 29 November)
• RE: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI (Friday, 29 November)

Robin Berjon

• Re: The RDDL challenge (Tuesday, 26 November)

Roy T. Fielding

• Action RF: rewrite of a principle (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: Determining what a URI identifies (Monday, 4 November)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Tuesday, 26 November)

Simon St.Laurent

• Re: Let's get some principles nailed down (Saturday, 23 November)
• Re: Let's get some principles nailed down (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Let's get some principles nailed down (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Let's get some principles nailed down (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF (Sunday, 17 November)
• Re: RDDL/RDF (Thursday, 14 November)
• RDDL/RDF (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: [Issue fragmentInXML-28] Use of fragment identifiers in XML (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: [Issue fragmentInXML-28] Use of fragment identifiers in XML (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: [Issue fragmentInXML-28] Use of fragment identifiers in XML (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Determining what a URI identifies (Monday, 4 November)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: Opacity and resource metadata (was Re: proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata (Wednesday, 27 November)

Svgdeveloper@aol.com

• Re: proposed TAG issue: future web architecture (Wednesday, 20 November)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: [Fwd: Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML)] (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: Determining what a URI identifies (Monday, 4 November)

Tim Bray

• Posted draft of URI comparison finding (Friday, 29 November)
• Re: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Opacity and resource metadata (was Re: proposed TAG issues: uniform resource version info and access of resource metadata (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: The RDDL challenge (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset (Monday, 25 November)
• The RDDL challenge (Saturday, 23 November)
• Re: Let's get some principles nailed down (Saturday, 23 November)
• Re: Let's get some principles nailed down (Friday, 22 November)
• Let's get some principles nailed down (Monday, 18 November)
• Commentary on 15 Nov Arch Doc WD (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF (Sunday, 17 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF (Monday, 11 November)
• My action item on RDDL/RDF (Sunday, 10 November)
• Suggested edit to Oct 29 arch doc (Sunday, 10 November)

Williams, Stuart

• Agenda for TAG Telcon 2nd December 2002 (Thursday, 28 November)
• RE: [Publication] 29 Oct 2002 Arch Doc (Wednesday, 13 November)
• RE: [Publication] 29 Oct 2002 Arch Doc (Monday, 11 November)

Wilson, MD (Michael)

• proposed TAG issue: future web architecture (Tuesday, 19 November)

Last message date: Friday, 29 November 2002 18:55:49 UTC