RE: Posted draft of URI comparison finding

I think this is an excellent idea.  We should also make sure that we have
these comparison types easily referencable from other specifications.  This
way specs could easily refer into the comparison types.  

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
> Paul Cotton
> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 6:49 AM
> To: Tim Bray; WWW-Tag
> Subject: RE: Posted draft of URI comparison finding
> 
> 
> 
> I wonder if it might be useful to give some examples of how W3C
> specifications support the comparison techniques outlined in 
> this draft
> finding.
> 
> For example in the section entitled "Simple String 
> Comparison" you could
> point to the op:anyURI-equal function defined in the XQuery 1.0 and
> XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators Working Draft [1].
> 
> /paulc
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-operators/#func-anyURI-equal 
> 
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
> Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
> <mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@textuality.com]
> > Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 3:14 AM
> > To: WWW-Tag
> > Subject: Posted draft of URI comparison finding
> > 
> > 
> > I just posted, at 
> http://www.textuality.com/tag/uri-comp.html, a first
> > cut at some finding language in comparing URIs.  I'm in 
> Narita running
> > for a plane so this got less proofreading than I usually have time
> for.
> > 
> > The subject expands remarkably once you start writing it all down.
> -Tim
> 
>