RDDL/RDF new proposal

• From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
• Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:52:41 -0500
• To: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>, <www-tag@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <00b201c28e51$5cd2f6e0$7c674544@ne.mediaone.net>

Tim, et al.

I've just posted a new edit to http://www.rddl.org/RDDL2

(see "RDF Option 2")

rddl2-xhtml.dtd is an XHTML Modularized DTD for this

briefly

<rddl:resource ID="XSD">
    <rddl:title>XML Schema</rddl:title>
    <rddl:nature resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"/>
    <rddl:purpose
resource="http://www.rddl.org/purposes#schema-validation"/>
    <rddl:related resource="http://example.org/L.xsd"/>
    <rddl:prose>
        <p>An XML Schema for the L namespace.</p>
    </rddl:prose>
</rddl:resource>

Given this version which I've compiled from suggestions on the TAG list, I
think the RDF tax is minimal, no, actually this is *more* readable than the
XLink version.

The major change is that we introduce the <rddl:related resource="foo.dtd"/>
element which points to the namespace related resource.

Jonathan

http://www.jonathanborden-md.com
http://www.erieneurosurgery.com
http://www.openhealth.org

Received on Sunday, 17 November 2002 11:12:41 UTC