W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > November 2002

Re: RDDL: Here is some 'real' RDF was: Re: minor RDF tax

From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 09:18:19 -0500
Message-Id: <p04330100ba03ecbf844b@[]>
To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>

At 2:59 PM -0500 11/17/02, Jonathan Borden wrote:

>which root element <rdf:RDF> or <html:html> ?
>Do we want RDDL to be legal XHTML that contains RDF snippets or legal RDF
>that is browsable? (browsers as you know are quite forgiving).

Legal XHTML that contains RDF snippets by all means. Browsers are 
forgiving but becoming less so, especially with XHTML. And I still 
suspect that the primary use of RDDL will be to give human developers 
a page to read when they type the namespace URL into the browser 
location bar.

| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
|          XML in a  Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/              |
|  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/  |
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
Received on Sunday, 24 November 2002 11:06:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:55 UTC