- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:27:55 -0500
- To: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- cc: www-tag@w3.org
jonathan@openhealth.org (Jonathan Borden) writes [corrected example]: >So then how about ><h:html xmlns:rddl="http://www.rddl.org/" >xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" > > <h:head> > <h:title>RDDL Description for http://example.org/L</h:title> > </h:head> > <h:body> > <h:h1>RDDL Description for http://example.org/L</h:h1> > <h:p>This document describes the "L" namespace and provides links to > related resources</h:p> > <rddl:resource ID="L"> > <rddl:title>DTD</rddl:title> > <rddl:nature >resource="http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/ >applicati >on/xml-dtd"/> > <rddl:purpose >resource="http://www.rddl.org/purposes#validation"/> > <rddl:related resource="http://example.org/L.dtd"/> > <rddl:prose><p>A DTD for the L language <L> is the root >element.</p></rddl:prose> > </rddl:resource> >..... ></h:body> ></h:html> > >The above *is* RDF and closely mirrors your ideal XML syntax - sure >there are some minor differences but you must admit the differences >are minor. That's really promising, yes. I have some ongoing concerns about the wisdom of using URI references in attributes, but that's a major improvement over its predecessors. ------------- Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA http://simonstl.com may be my URI http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2002 10:27:49 UTC