- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:05:59 -0800
- To: robin.berjon@expway.fr
- Cc: WWW-Tag <www-tag@w3.org>
Robin Berjon wrote: > Tim Bray wrote: > > > Scope: We assume that a RDDL document is XHTML with embedded > > machine-readable information > > > This is not a proposal, just a nit/question (and in the abstract at > that): should XHTML be assumed or should it rather be something along > the lines of "human-readable XML vocabulary"? I personally prefer XHTML because I think there's real value in being able to type the namespace URI into any browser and something useful happens. But let's not micro-manage this, make any proposal you want -Tim
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2002 15:06:02 UTC