- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 02:18:19 +0900
- To: www-international@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
FYI. >Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:21:42 -0500 >From: Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com> >To: w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org >CC: iab@iab.org, iesg@ietf.org >Subject: IAB discussions & IRIs >Martin, W3C folks, > > The IETF notes that the W3C's XML Core group recently asked >the W3C's TAG for input on whether the IRI spec should be promoted >within W3C specs at this time. According to the following, the TAG >has accepted this as an issue: > >http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#IRIEverywhere-27 > >We also note that the authors have recently issued a revision to the >IRI draft: > >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-duerst-iri-02.txt > > Discussions within the IESG and IAB about this have revealed >that there are significant concerns about the use of internationalized >strings and protocol elements, which has implications for this >draft. In the short term, we would very much appreciate your not >promoting the IRI spec while these concerns are addressed. We hope to >clearly state our concerns in a document within a fairly short period of >time. We certainly understand that this draft has been in the IETF for >two years or so, but it is part of a larger puzzle of which we >are attempting to get enough community understanding to be able >to proceed appropriately with all protocols using and exchanging >textual protocol elements. > >Best regards, Leslie. > > >-- > >------------------------------------------------------------------- >"An essential element of a successful journey > is recognizing when you have arrived." > -- ThinkingCat (c.1983 - 2002) > >Leslie Daigle >leslie@thinkingcat.com >-------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 25 November 2002 12:19:29 UTC