- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:52:49 +0000
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- CC: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>, WWW-Tag <www-tag@w3.org>
Tim Bray wrote: > > Paul Prescod wrote: > >> Not in a way that will be accessible to RDF processors. They have no >> notion of the relationship between resource and representation, AFAIK. > > > Aahhh... the RDF tax strikes again. I want to do something that is > obvious and straightforward and implicit in the resource/representation > relationship, and using RDF is going to cost me oceans of arcane totally > human-opaque syntax. That is a Web tax, not an RDF tax. A representation is just that - it won't have a URI unless you give it one. Only the thing it represents will have a URI by default. You will want to give the representation a URI to make it a resource, or make the representation a Literal property value of the resource it represents. Bill de hÓra
Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2002 08:56:13 UTC