- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 18:16:24 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Dear www-tag, Issue fragmentInXML-28 [1] was been accepted by the TAG at their 28 Oct 2002 teleconference [2]. Do fragment identifiers refer to a syntactice element (at least for XML content), or can they refer to abstractions? Example from 17.2.2 SVG fragment identifiers: MyDrawing.svg#svgView(viewBox(0,200,1000,1000)) The SVG spec states "This form of addressing specifies the desired view of the document (e.g., the region of the document to view, the initial zoom level) completely within the SVG fragment specification." From Dan Connolly: Do you consider the quoted paragraph above in error? Or do you disagree with my interpretation of it, i.e. that MyDrawing.svg#svgView(viewBox(0,200,1000,1000)) identifes a view of the drawing, and not any particular XML element (nor other syntactic structure) in the document. Raised by, on behalf of Dan Connolly, TAG Concerning XML Background and related * httpRange-14 State (Raised, Accepted, Declined, Resolved, etc.) * 31 Oct 2002 Raised * 4 Nov 2002 Accepted Discussion history None. Assigned to None. Resolution summary None. [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28 [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/11/04-tag-summary#frags -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 18:16:25 UTC