- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 18:16:24 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Dear www-tag,
Issue fragmentInXML-28 [1] was been accepted by the TAG at their
28 Oct 2002 teleconference [2].
Do fragment identifiers refer to a syntactice element (at least for
XML content), or can they refer to abstractions?
Example from 17.2.2 SVG fragment identifiers:
MyDrawing.svg#svgView(viewBox(0,200,1000,1000))
The SVG spec states "This form of addressing specifies the desired
view of the document (e.g., the region of the document to view, the
initial zoom level) completely within the SVG fragment specification."
From Dan Connolly:
Do you consider the quoted paragraph above in error?
Or do you disagree with my interpretation of it, i.e. that
MyDrawing.svg#svgView(viewBox(0,200,1000,1000)) identifes a view
of the drawing, and not any particular XML element (nor other
syntactic structure) in the document.
Raised by, on behalf of
Dan Connolly, TAG
Concerning
XML
Background and related
* httpRange-14
State (Raised, Accepted, Declined, Resolved, etc.)
* 31 Oct 2002 Raised
* 4 Nov 2002 Accepted
Discussion history
None.
Assigned to
None.
Resolution summary
None.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/11/04-tag-summary#frags
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 18:16:25 UTC