Re: The RDDL challenge

Tim Bray wrote:
> Scope: We assume that a RDDL document is XHTML with embedded 
> machine-readable information

This is not a proposal, just a nit/question (and in the abstract at that): 
should XHTML be assumed or should it rather be something along the lines of 
"human-readable XML vocabulary"? I would tend to prefer the openness of the 
latter which allows for instance for SVG or XML+CSS, but maybe you have reasons 
to believe that XHTML is a better fit, in which case exposing them might help 
the definition of proposals.

Robin Berjon <>
Research Engineer, Expway
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2002 09:16:32 UTC