W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > November 2002

Re: The RDDL challenge

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 15:15:30 +0100
Message-ID: <3DE38202.7070202@expway.fr>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
CC: WWW-Tag <www-tag@w3.org>

Tim Bray wrote:
> Scope: We assume that a RDDL document is XHTML with embedded 
> machine-readable information

This is not a proposal, just a nit/question (and in the abstract at that): 
should XHTML be assumed or should it rather be something along the lines of 
"human-readable XML vocabulary"? I would tend to prefer the openness of the 
latter which allows for instance for SVG or XML+CSS, but maybe you have reasons 
to believe that XHTML is a better fit, in which case exposing them might help 
the definition of proposals.

Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Research Engineer, Expway
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2002 09:16:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:55 UTC