Friday, 31 October 2003
- Re: LC2 semantics proof appendix
- [closed] Re: proposed test of RDFS entailment rules
- Re: schema and semantics differ: range of rdf:predicate?
- RDFCore teleconference: 2003-10-31
- Re: MIME type regostration notes
- Re: LC2 semantics proof appendix
- Re: entailment-from-inconsistent-graph: new test case request
- rdf.rdf
- Re: entailment-from-inconsistent-graph: new test case request
- Re: entailment-from-inconsistent-graph: new test case request
- Re: schema and semantics differ: range of rdf:predicate?
- Re: [closed] Re: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
- Re: MIME type regostration notes
- Re: non english labels/comments for rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdf
- Re: non english labels/comments for rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdf
- Re: 2396bis
- Re: non english labels/comments for rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdf
- Re: non english labels/comments for rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdf
- Re: 2396bis
- Draft Request to Advance
- Re: 2396bis
- Re: non english labels/comments for rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdf
- MIME type regostration notes
- Re: ISWC Florida Ra! Ra!
- Re: [closed] Re: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
- Re: 2396bis
- Re: non english labels/comments for rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdf
- Re: rdfcore 2003-10-31 agenda (docs, docs, docs, status, futures...)
Thursday, 30 October 2003
- 2396bis
- ISWC Florida Ra! Ra!
- non english labels/comments for rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdf
- schema and semantics differ: range of rdf:predicate?
- ACTION 20030718#4 done
- [Fwd: [Fwd: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group]]
- Re: [closed] Re: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
- [closed] Re: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
- Re: rdfcore 2003-10-31 agenda (docs, docs, docs, status, futures...)
- Re: rdfcore 2003-10-31 agenda (docs, docs, docs, status, futures...)
- rdfcore 2003-10-31 agenda (docs, docs, docs, status, futures...)
- RE: test xmlbase/test012
- Re: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
- Re: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
- Re: test xmlbase/test012
- Re: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
- Re: Call for agenda items
Wednesday, 29 October 2003
- Call for agenda items
- Re: regrets 31st Oct
- regrets 31st Oct
- RE: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
- test xmlbase/test012
- RE: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
Tuesday, 28 October 2003
- RE: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
- RE: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
- Fwd: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
- Re: entailment-from-inconsistent-graph [was: proposed test of RDFS entailment rules]
Monday, 27 October 2003
- Re: RDF Semantics: a partial review
- Re: entailment-from-inconsistent-graph [was: proposed test of RDFS entailment rules]
Sunday, 26 October 2003
Thursday, 23 October 2003
- Re: RDFCore 24 Oct 2003 call CANCELLED Re: Call for agenda items - possible cancellation of this weeks telecon
- Re: RDFCore 24 Oct 2003 call CANCELLED Re: Call for agenda items - possible cancellation of this weeks telecon
- RDFCore 24 Oct 2003 call CANCELLED Re: Call for agenda items - possible cancellation of this weeks telecon
Wednesday, 22 October 2003
- Re: Call for agenda items - possible cancellation of this weeks telecon
- Re: Call for agenda items - possible cancellation of this weeks telecon
- Call for agenda items - possible cancellation of this weeks telecon
Saturday, 18 October 2003
Friday, 17 October 2003
Thursday, 16 October 2003
- Re: entailment-from-inconsistent-graph: new test case request
- Re: Telecon 17 Nov 2003 CANCELLED
- Telecon 17 Nov 2003 CANCELLED
- Minutes, 2003-10-10
Wednesday, 15 October 2003
- possible Semantic Web panel at W3C AC meeting
- Re: Regrets for Friday telecon ()
- RDF Semantics: partial review
- Re: Regrets for Friday telecon ()
- entailment-from-inconsistent-graph: new test case request
- weekly call for agenda items - possibly cancel telecon?
- Regrets for Friday
- Regrets for Friday telecon ()
- Re: Diffs now available
Tuesday, 14 October 2003
- Re: Diffs now available
- disposition of 2nd last call comments doc created
- [Fwd: Request for PR of Namespaces in XML 1.1]
- [Fwd: Request for PR for XML 1.1]
Monday, 13 October 2003
- Re: semantics proof appendix fixed
- semantics proof appendix fixed
- [Fwd: RDFCore 2nd last call announcement]
- Re: Diffs now available
- Diffs now available
Friday, 10 October 2003
- RE: Assessment of semantics bug: [was: Re: proof bug in semantics]
- Re: LC2 semantics proof appendix
- Assessment of semantics bug: [was: Re: proof bug in semantics]
- Re: LC2 semantics proof appendix
- Re: normative statement that xsd:string subclass of plain literals
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-10
- LC2 semantics proof appendix
- proof bug in semantics
Thursday, 9 October 2003
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-10
- Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-10
- Updated semantics: [[was: Re: normative statement that xsd:string subclass of plain literals
- Re: normative statement that xsd:string subclass of plain literals
- Re: More issues lists links gone
- Re: normative statement that xsd:string subclass of plain literals
- normative statement that xsd:string subclass of plain literals
- RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
Wednesday, 8 October 2003
- Re: testcases LC2 working draft ready
- testcases LC2 working draft ready
- regrets 10 October telecon
- More issues lists links gone
- Re: Question about semantics spec
- Re: Lc pub docs
- Re: Peter's objection to the RDF(S) rules
- Re: status of this document template
- Re: Peter's objection to the RDF(S) rules
- Re: Question about semantics spec
- Re: Lc pub docs
- Re: Broken/gone RDF LC issue links
- Re: Broken/gone RDF LC issue links
- Question about semantics spec
- another matter entirely
Tuesday, 7 October 2003
- Re: primer LC working draft
- syntax LC2 working draft ready
- Re: Document crosslinks
- Lc pub docs
- Broken/gone RDF LC issue links
- Re: status of this document template
- final concepts changes
- Document crosslinks
- Re: Peter's objection to the RDF(S) rules
- Re: Peter's objection to the RDF(S) rules
- Peter's objection to the RDF(S) rules
Monday, 6 October 2003
- semantics doc boilerplate OK
- ACTION 2003-10-03#8 completed
- primer LC working draft
- semantics document
- status of this document template
- Re: Fw: [closed] xmlsch-11 layering on xml
- Re: rdf:RDF examples (was Re: Minutes of 2003-10-03 RDFCore WG telcon)
- Fw: [closed] xmlsch-11 layering on xml
- Fw: [closed] xmlsch-10 canonical syntax
- rdf:RDF examples (was Re: Minutes of 2003-10-03 RDFCore WG telcon)
Sunday, 5 October 2003
Saturday, 4 October 2003
Friday, 3 October 2003
- Re: RDF MIME registration
- RDF MIME registration
- Re: Proposed rdf:RDF change
- RDF semantics document
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- Minutes of 2003-10-03 RDFCore WG telcon
- Re: Internal DTD Examples Invalidate the RDF/XML Documents
- Re: Proposed rdf:RDF change
- RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- Re: htmldiff
- Proposed rdf:RDF change
- RE: Internal DTD Examples Invalidate the RDF/XML Documents
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- NFC text in semantics
- Re: Regrets: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-03
- Regrets: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-03
- Re: XML Schema response :(
- RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- Re: list of objections
- Re: Webont's position w.r.t XML Literal design
- Re: semantics doc now post-HorrocksPan
- Re: RDF Semantics WD
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- htmldiff
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
Thursday, 2 October 2003
Friday, 3 October 2003
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-03
- semantics doc now post-HorrocksPan
- Re: RDF Review
- Re: RDF Review
- RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-03
Thursday, 2 October 2003
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- RDF Semantics WD
- RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- Webont's position w.r.t XML Literal design
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-03
- RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- Editor's Draft of RDF/XML updated for 2 Oct 2003
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- Re: test cases wording
- Re: test cases wording
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- list of objections
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- Re: Rough draft of datatypes with whitespace text
- Re: Rough draft of datatypes with whitespace text
Wednesday, 1 October 2003
- Re: revised Primer
- revised Primer
- Re: test cases wording
- Re: Current status of my actions list
- test cases wording
- Re: Current status of my actions list
- Re: RDF Semantics: partial review
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- weekly call for agenda items
- Fwd "a comment on NFC"
- Re: Rough draft of datatypes with whitespace text
- Re: Rough draft of datatypes with whitespace text
- Re: Current status of my actions list
- Re: Rough draft of datatypes with whitespace text
- XML Schema response :(
- Re: RDF Semantics: partial review
- Rough draft of datatypes with whitespace text
- Current status of my actions list
- Re: collecting objections
- Re: Proposed modification to syntax re xml:lang