Re: normative statement that xsd:string subclass of plain literals

>Dave Reynolds was asking me about the relationship between plain 
>literals and xsd:string, i.e is a plain literal without a lang tag 
>(modulo some funny characters) an xsd:string.
>
>I adopted the policy of referring him to the spec and indeed he came 
>back and said "found it, its in the bit about entailment rules."
>
>"Bu**er", I said, that section is now informative!

True. I will put an appropriate remark into the normative section 5.

Done. Its a paragraph with the anchor #xsdstringlitnote,
cf
  http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_LC2.1_NFC.html#xsdstringlitnote

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes

Received on Thursday, 9 October 2003 09:38:52 UTC