- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:19:06 +0100
- To: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Request for PR for XML 1.1 Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:39:40 -0400 (EDT) Resent-From: chairs@w3.org Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:39:03 -0500 From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com> To: timbl@w3.org, Steve Bratt <steve@w3.org>, w3c-xml-cg <w3c-xml-cg@w3.org> CC: chairs@w3.org, webreq@w3.org, w3t-comm@w3.org, John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> The XML Core WG requests publication of the following document as a W3C Proposed Recommendation: http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2003/10/PR-xml11-20031010/Overview.html A review version with diffs noted is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2003/10/PR-xml11-20031010/PR-xml11-20031010-review.html The URL cited above is for the most recent Member-only version of the specification, dated 10 October 2003. The Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1 specification was published as a Candidate Recommendation on 10 October 2002. The list of issues that were raised and discussed can be found at (member-only): http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2003/03/xml11-doc/xml11-cr-comments.html And a document containing the comments received from other WGs and the public as well as the WG's final disposition of those comments may be found at: http://www.w3.org/XML/2003/06/xml11-cr-doc.html In general, the XML Core WG has not received any replies from commenters saying that our responses were inadequate. We did receive several replies saying our answers were fine. And the document being sent to PR contains the changes that were made to accommodate these comments. However, the XML Core WG wants to highlight the fact that our CR request at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2002JulSep/0128.html said: <quote> The removal of direct representation of control characters in the range #x7F-#x9F represents a change in well-formedness. That is, well-formed XML 1.0 documents which contain these characters do not become well-formed XML 1.1 documents simply by changing their version number. Occurrences of control characters must also be converted to numeric character references. As a criterion for exiting CR, the XML Core WG will collect evidence substantiating (or contradicting) our opinion that: 1) converting characters in the #x7F-#x9F range to numeric character references while updating XML 1.0 documents to XML 1.1 does not represent a significant obstacle to adoption of XML 1.1; 2) there are no significant scenarios where converting characters in the #x7F-#x9F range to numeric character references is impractical or impossible; 3) that the benefits of this change to the proper detection of character encoding represent a significant improvement in interoperability. </quote> This is reflected by Issue Tobin-01 in our Issues doc at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2003/03/xml11-doc/xml11-cr-comments.html#issue-Tobin-01 <quote> Summary: Is requiring the escaping of C1 control characters worth it? After much discussion spanning many telcons, we continue to have WG members with strong views on both sides of the issue. During our May 28 telcon[http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2003AprJun/0182.h tml] (member only), we took a vote in which we had 4 members for, 4 against, and 4 abstentions. The chair declared UNRESOLVABLE LACK of CONSENSUS. We therefore close the issue in favor of the status quo, but will highlight this issue in our PR request. Resolution: After much discussion spanning many telcons, we continue to have WG members with strong views on both sides of the issue. During our May 28 telcon, we took a vote in which we had 4 members for, 4 against, and 4 abstentions. The chair declared UNRESOLVABLE LACK of CONSENSUS. We therefore close the issue in favor of the status quo, but will highlight this issue in our PR request. </quote> The WG's decision to request publication as a Proposed Recommendation was taken during a teleconference on 8 October 2003, minutes may be found at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2003OctDec/0034 EXITING CR The main purposes of the CR period was to gain feedback based on implementation experience. The XML Core WG set a goal of having at least 2 successful implementations of the specification. As of today, we know of at least 4 implementations. However, the XML Core WG wants to highlight the lack of support for the character normalization checking feature. Only one non-commercial implementation of this feature has been developed and, while it demonstrates the feasibility of the implementation, it does not demonstrate support from vendors and does not satisfy our CR exit criteria. The XML Core WG however decided to leave it in the specification because it is an optional feature and was included at the request of the I18N WG. See the implementation report at: http://www.w3.org/XML/2002/09/xml11-implementation SCHEDULE We propose that the PR period for XML 1.1 to last for eight weeks from publication. REQUIREMENTS OF TRANSITION The XML Core WG approved publication during our telcon of 2003 Oct 8: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2003OctDec/0034 Changes to the document are highlighted by the review version at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2003/10/PR-xml11-20031010/PR-xml11-20031010-review.html The WG believes it has addressed all of the requirements in the RD at http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-blueberry-req Evidence that issues have been addressed can be seen in our Disposition of Comments document at http://www.w3.org/XML/2003/06/xml11-cr-doc.html An Implementation report is at http://www.w3.org/XML/2002/09/xml11-implementation Our IPR disclosure page is at http://www.w3.org/2002/08/xmlcore-IPR-statements PROPOSED PR ABSTRACT AND STATUS SECTIONS Abstract -------- The Extensible Markup Language (XML) is a subset of SGML that is completely described in this document. Its goal is to enable generic SGML to be served, received, and processed on the Web in the way that is now possible with HTML. XML has been designed for ease of implementation and for interoperability with both SGML and HTML. Status of this document ----------------------- This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/. This document is a Proposed Recommendation of the W3C. This document is based on the feedback from implementers on the XML 1.0 Candidate Recommendation dated 15 October 2002, and the XML Core Working Group believes that the specification is now stable and ready for the Advisory Committee review. Publication as a Proposed Recommendation does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress. Please send comments on this Proposed Recommendation to www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org (public archives are available). W3C Advisory Committee Representatives may also send comments, visible only to the Team or to the Membership, through the form available in the Call for Review. The review period extends to four weeks after the approval of PR. [Publication Team: please change this to a hard date before final publication.] Reviewers are encouraged to read the XHTML with color-coded revision indicators; this version highlights each substantive change separating XML 1.1 from XML 1.0. This document specifies a syntax created by subsetting an existing, widely used international text processing standard (Standard Generalized Markup Language, ISO 8879:1986(E) as amended and corrected) for use on the World Wide Web. It is a product of the W3C XML Activity, details of which can be found at http://www.w3.org/XML. The English version of this specification is the only normative version. However, for translations of this document, see http://www.w3.org/2003/03/Translations/byTechnology?technology=xml11. A list of current W3C Recommendations and other technical documents can be found at http://www.w3.org/TR. Documentation of intellectual property possibly relevant to this recommendation may be found at the Working Group's public IPR disclosure page. An implementation report for XML 1.1 is available at http://www.w3.org/XML/2002/09/xml11-implementation.html. Please report errors in this document to xml-editor@w3.org; archives are available. The errata list for this third edition is available at http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata. A Test Suite is maintained to help assessing conformance to this specification. Paul Grosso and Arnaud Le Hors, chairs of the XML Core WG.
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2003 06:19:44 UTC