Updated semantics: [[was: Re: normative statement that xsd:string subclass of plain literals

Eric,

I have not copied this into shadow TR space - I didn't want to mess with 
the docs in the middle of the publishing process.

I leave it to you to see if you can get the updated version published.

Pat - thanks - that was very quick.

Brian

pat hayes wrote:
>> Dave Reynolds was asking me about the relationship between plain 
>> literals and xsd:string, i.e is a plain literal without a lang tag 
>> (modulo some funny characters) an xsd:string.
>>
>> I adopted the policy of referring him to the spec and indeed he came 
>> back and said "found it, its in the bit about entailment rules."
>>
>> "Bu**er", I said, that section is now informative!
> 
> 
> True. I will put an appropriate remark into the normative section 5.
> 
> Done. Its a paragraph with the anchor #xsdstringlitnote,
> cf
>  http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_LC2.1_NFC.html#xsdstringlitnote 
> 
> 
> Pat

Received on Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:11:50 UTC