- From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 19:11:57 +0100 (BST)
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time: 10:00:00 Fri Oct 03 2003 in America/New York duration 60 minutes which is equivalent to 15:00:00 Fri Oct 03 2003 in Europe/London Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332 irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore 1: scribe - volunteer needed Please could the minutes conform to: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0216.html 2: Roll Call 3: Thanks 4: Review Agenda 5: Next telecon 10 Oct 2003 1000 Boston Time Volunteer Scribe 6: Minutes of 26 Sep 2003 telecon as revised See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0267.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0273.html 7: Confirm Status of Completed Actions ACTION: 20030815#9 jjc draft implementation report response to i18n objection see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0259.html ACTION: 2003-08-29#1 gk to check with aaron on status of the rdf mimetypes draft see: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-swartz-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-03.txt ACTION: 2003-09-12#3 jjc mention other designs in I18N proposed response ACTION: 20030919#1 jjc review syntax text on bnode IDs see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0240.html ACTION: 20030919#2 path Check link to RDF URI Reference from Semantics to Concepts see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0014.html ACTION: 20030919#3 jjc change URI text in concepts ACTION: 20030919#4 jjc respond to pfps on URIs cc martin see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0346.html ACTION: 20030919#5 bwm s/none/no response/ in last call comments see: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/ ACTION: 20030919#9 jjc e-mail webont with 02 Oct comment deadline see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Sep/0222.html ACTION: 20030919#10 danbri e-mail rdfinterest with 02 Oct comment deadline see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003Sep/0149.html ACTION: 20030919#11 danbri e-mail chairs list concerning LC 2 see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2003JulSep/0067.html ACTION: 20030919#12 danbri identify and e-mail individual chairs re LC 2 see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2003JulSep/0067.html ACTION: 20030919#13 jjc suggest herman makes personal comment before webont OK ACTION: 20030919#14 PatH To consider amendments to test cases concerning nonentailments see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0015.html ACTION: 20030926#1 JJC add nfc text to Concepts as proposed ACTION: 20030926#2 JJC review i18n rebuttal document to take specific account of formal objection text from i18n see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0275.html ACTION: 20030926#5 JJC draft proposal that whitespace processing is part of L2V map see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0003.html ACTION: 20030926#6 PatH update semantics document to replace lbase appendix with fireproof reference to lbase doc see: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/ 8: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions ACTION: 20030926#8 DanBri record Karstens dissent in rdfs spec see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0368.html 9: Status of Misc Actions 10: Update on last call comments pfps-02,pfps-03 and pfps-06 resolved acceptably to pfps pfps-12 resolved acceptably for Karsten This leaves formal objections on pfps-04 and pfps-05 concerning the entailment rules. 11: Literals must be in NFC Consider changing language from MUST to SHOULD. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0010.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0022.html 12: Meeting requirements for last call. Have we addressed all outstanding comments/issues? (xmlsch-02?) http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/ uptodate? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0358.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0005.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0363.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0373.html Have we done the best we can on the outstanding objections? http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/objections.html Have we negotiated a reasonable LC review period with other groups? 20030919#11 danbri e-mail chairs list concerning LC 2 20030919#12 danbri identify and e-mail individual chairs re LC 2 Are the documents ready? 20030919#8 danbri produce boiler plate for SOTD 2003-08-29#2 danbri to investigation production of script for fixing up internal references 20030919#7 ericm contact comm to get publication date Are there any features that should be identified as "at risk"? Change logs correct? Diffs from previous versions? primer concepts syntax schema semantics test cases 20030919#14 PatH To consider amendments to test cases concerning nonentailments 13: Handling lc2 comments. ------------------------------------------------------------ This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant, running on Jena 2
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:14:39 UTC