- From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 19:11:57 +0100 (BST)
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time:
10:00:00 Fri Oct 03 2003 in America/New York duration 60 minutes
which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Oct 03 2003 in Europe/London
Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore
1: scribe - volunteer needed
Please could the minutes conform to:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0216.html
2: Roll Call
3: Thanks
4: Review Agenda
5: Next telecon 10 Oct 2003 1000 Boston Time
Volunteer Scribe
6: Minutes of 26 Sep 2003 telecon as revised
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0267.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0273.html
7: Confirm Status of Completed Actions
ACTION: 20030815#9 jjc
draft implementation report response to i18n objection
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0259.html
ACTION: 2003-08-29#1 gk
to check with aaron on status of the rdf mimetypes draft
see:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-swartz-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-03.txt
ACTION: 2003-09-12#3 jjc
mention other designs in I18N proposed response
ACTION: 20030919#1 jjc
review syntax text on bnode IDs
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0240.html
ACTION: 20030919#2 path
Check link to RDF URI Reference from Semantics to Concepts
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0014.html
ACTION: 20030919#3 jjc
change URI text in concepts
ACTION: 20030919#4 jjc
respond to pfps on URIs cc martin
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0346.html
ACTION: 20030919#5 bwm
s/none/no response/ in last call comments
see:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/
ACTION: 20030919#9 jjc
e-mail webont with 02 Oct comment deadline
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Sep/0222.html
ACTION: 20030919#10 danbri
e-mail rdfinterest with 02 Oct comment deadline
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003Sep/0149.html
ACTION: 20030919#11 danbri
e-mail chairs list concerning LC 2
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2003JulSep/0067.html
ACTION: 20030919#12 danbri
identify and e-mail individual chairs re LC 2
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2003JulSep/0067.html
ACTION: 20030919#13 jjc
suggest herman makes personal comment before webont OK
ACTION: 20030919#14 PatH
To consider amendments to test cases concerning nonentailments
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0015.html
ACTION: 20030926#1 JJC
add nfc text to Concepts as proposed
ACTION: 20030926#2 JJC
review i18n rebuttal document to take specific account of formal objection text from i18n
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0275.html
ACTION: 20030926#5 JJC
draft proposal that whitespace processing is part of L2V map
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0003.html
ACTION: 20030926#6 PatH
update semantics document to replace lbase appendix with fireproof reference to lbase doc
see:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/
8: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions
ACTION: 20030926#8 DanBri
record Karstens dissent in rdfs spec
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0368.html
9: Status of Misc Actions
10: Update on last call comments
pfps-02,pfps-03 and pfps-06 resolved acceptably to pfps
pfps-12 resolved acceptably for Karsten
This leaves formal objections on pfps-04 and pfps-05 concerning the
entailment rules.
11: Literals must be in NFC
Consider changing language from MUST to SHOULD.
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0010.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0022.html
12: Meeting requirements for last call.
Have we addressed all outstanding comments/issues? (xmlsch-02?)
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/ uptodate?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0358.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0005.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0363.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0373.html
Have we done the best we can on the outstanding objections?
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/objections.html
Have we negotiated a reasonable LC review period with other groups?
20030919#11 danbri e-mail chairs list concerning LC 2
20030919#12 danbri identify and e-mail individual
chairs re LC 2
Are the documents ready?
20030919#8 danbri produce boiler plate for SOTD
2003-08-29#2 danbri to investigation production of
script for fixing up internal
references
20030919#7 ericm contact comm to get publication date
Are there any features that should be identified as "at risk"?
Change logs correct?
Diffs from previous versions?
primer
concepts
syntax
schema
semantics
test cases
20030919#14 PatH To consider amendments to test cases concerning
nonentailments
13: Handling lc2 comments.
------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant, running on Jena 2
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:14:39 UTC