- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 14:10:04 +0100
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Cc: RDFCore list <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Guus, Thank you for this comment. Brian Guus Schreiber wrote: > > Dear RDFCore colleagues, > > The Web Ontology Working Group has discussed its position w.r.t. the XML > Literal design > > From the Webont perspective there were serious problems with the LC1 > design of XML literals, as indicated by the official comments from > Webont and the individual comments from Patel-Schneider. The new XML > literal design, as specified in the current WDs, appears to Webont to > be a well-motivated rational design choice in a space of conflicting > requirements [1]. RDFCore has provided compelling arguments against the > alternatives proposed by I18N (see e.g. [2]). The current post-LC > design works for OWL and is our preferred design in the context of the > options currently on the table. > > On behalf of the Web Ontology Working Group > Guus Schreiber, cochair > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Sep/att-0002/i18n-part-1.html > > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2003Aug/0004 >
Received on Friday, 3 October 2003 09:12:20 UTC