W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2003

Re: Minutes of 2003-10-03 RDFCore WG telcon

From: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 15:53:10 -0400
Message-ID: <3F7F2526.5020400@acm.org>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Dave Beckett wrote:

> 2003-10-03 RDFCore WG meeting


> ACTION 2003-10-03#8 frankm change primer to have an omitted rdf:RDF example

Not quite.  I accepted an action to reflect the optionality of rdf:RDF 
in the Primer.  It seems silly, given all the examples currently in the 
Primer, to have yet another example just to omit the rdf:RDF.  What I 
propose to do is to comment, at the point where rdf:RDF is introduced, 
that the enclosing rdf:RDF element is optional in situations where the 
XML can be identified as RDF/XML by context (but it doesn't hurt to 
provide it anyway), and to see the Syntax document for further details.

Received on Saturday, 4 October 2003 15:26:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:26 UTC