- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 13:58:01 +0100
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: ext Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Sorry Patrick I did not provide context ... Patrick: > > Eh??! At the telecon on Friday it was mentioned that we might get a negative comment from XML Schema WG about whitespace. However, as you will have seen, most likely we get no comment. Given the tight timeline the chairs asked that I should have a draft ready for consideration if the WG wished to reopen this issue in light of a negative comment. I am largely on your side, I think the text I posted is a bit of a hash, but tries to make as clean a job as possible of the potential alternative design. I am not expecting this to be proposed, but await the agenda with interest. The scenario we are trying to avoid is getting blown off course by a comment we cannot ignore saying we have made a mistake. I wonder if the last call for review should mention this as an at risk aspect of the design, and whether that can be done in a way that still allows us to change if we get LC2 comments to the effect that we should. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2003 09:04:24 UTC