- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:15:23 +0100
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I'm back to editing that doc with emacs- which is *impossible*. But the anchors are fixed. Brian Dave Beckett wrote: > The W3C link validator reported on the current doc at > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030117/ > the following broken links to the issues list: > > [[ > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/ > What to do: There are broken fragments which must be fixed. > HTTP Code returned: 200 > HTTP Message: OK > Lines: 1365, 1366, 1373, 1378, 1380, 2581, 2582 > > Broken fragments and their line numbers: They need to be fixed! > rdfms-syntax-incomplete: 1378 > rdfms-aboutEach-on-object: 2581 > rdfms-seq-representation: 1373 > ]] > > > These seem to have disappeared since the last publication of the WDs; > the text in the issues list has no anchors for the issues anymore. > For example: > [[ > <h3>Issue rdfms-syntax-incomplete: The RDF/XML syntax can't represent an > an arbritary graph structure.</h3> > ]] > -- http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/ > > Dave
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:20:48 UTC