Re: Rough draft of datatypes with whitespace text

Whew!

Thanks,

Patrick



On 2003-10-01 15:58, "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> Sorry Patrick I did not provide context ...
> 
> Patrick:
> 
>> 
>> Eh??!
> 
> At the telecon on Friday it was mentioned that we might get a negative
> comment from XML Schema WG about whitespace.
> 
> However, as you will have seen, most likely we get no comment.
> 
> Given the tight timeline the chairs asked that I should have a draft ready
> for consideration if the WG wished to reopen this issue in light of a
> negative comment.
> 
> I am largely on your side, I think the text I posted is a bit of a hash,
> but tries to make as clean a job as possible of the potential alternative
> design. I am not expecting this to be proposed, but await the agenda with
> interest.
> 
> The scenario we are trying to avoid is getting blown off course by a
> comment we cannot ignore saying we have made a mistake.
> 
> I wonder if the last call for review should mention this as an at risk
> aspect of the design, and whether that can be done in a way that still
> allows us to change if we get LC2 comments to the effect that we should.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 2 October 2003 02:21:18 UTC