public-webapps-github@w3.org from October 2020 by author

32309895+sheri21@users.noreply.github

• [whatwg/fetch] Help network hacked (#1103) (Friday, 23 October)

[ Cassondra ]

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Editor support for WebComponents (#776) (Wednesday, 21 October)

Aaron Gustafson

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding field `display_override` to the manifest (#932) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Related applications parsing is incorrect (#936) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Related applications parsing is incorrect (#936) (Monday, 19 October)

Abdón Rodríguez Davila

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] DOM Parts: Fix minor issues (#905) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• [w3c/webcomponents] [DOM Parts] Fix typo (#900) (Tuesday, 27 October)

achristensen07

• Re: [whatwg/url] File URL reparse bug with percent encoded windows drive letter (#559) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] File URL reparse bug with percent encoded windows drive letter (#559) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] File URL reparse bug with percent encoded windows drive letter (#559) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Big5 encoding mishandles some trailing bytes, with possible XSS (#171) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Percent-encoding of query wrong for ISO-2022-JP (#557) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Percent-encoding of query wrong for ISO-2022-JP (#557) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Add details to host and path setters (#551) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Add details to host and path setters (#551) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow ports in file URLs (#548) (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow ports in file URLs (#548) (Wednesday, 14 October)
• [whatwg/url] Add details to host and path setters (#551) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow ports in file URLs (#548) (Monday, 5 October)
• [whatwg/url] Allow ports in file URLs (#548) (Saturday, 3 October)

Adam Rice

• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add Explainer for Byte Streams (#1081) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Fix readable byte stream example (#1080) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add Explainer for Byte Streams (#1081) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Fix readable byte stream example (#1080) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Fix readable byte stream example (#1080) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Fix readable byte stream example (#1080) (Tuesday, 27 October)

Ale763

• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Detecting service worker termination (#1550) (Wednesday, 28 October)

Alessandro (Ale) Segala

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handing fetch termination (#1178) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handing fetch termination (#1178) (Wednesday, 7 October)

Alexey Shvayka

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Define that interface objects are constructors (#698) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Define that interface objects are constructors (#698) (Tuesday, 20 October)

Alexis Hunt

• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Friday, 16 October)

Alice

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Declarative Shadow DOM (#494) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] APA Pronunciation Explainer (#561) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Mechanism for setting the tabindex focus flag without sprouting tabindex attribute? (#762) (Wednesday, 7 October)

Alwin Blok

• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Support relative URLs (#531) (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Support relative URLs (#531) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow ports in file URLs (#548) (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow ports in file URLs (#548) (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow ports in file URLs (#548) (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow ports in file URLs (#548) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow ports in file URLs (#548) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Support relative URLs (#531) (Thursday, 1 October)

Andrea Giammarchi

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Saturday, 31 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Should there be a declarative version of adoptedStyleSheets? (#910) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: add `childFilter` option to `MutationObserverInit` (#905) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: add `children` option to `MutationObserverInit` (#905) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• [whatwg/dom] Proposal: add `children` option to `MutationObserverInit` (#905) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider specifying document.evaluate and document.createNSResolver (#67) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)

Andreu Botella

• Re: [whatwg/url] Refactor query state to operate on a buffer (#558) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Clarify instance language around decoders and encoders (#241) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add some minor clarifications. (#244) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add some minor clarifications. (#244) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add some minor clarifications. (#244) (Monday, 26 October)
• [whatwg/encoding] Add some minor clarifications. (#244) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Questionable conversion in BOM Sniff (#243) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Clarify instance language around decoders and encoders (#241) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Talk about instances of decoders and encoders (#240) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Prepending or conversion of a sequence possibly not exact enough explained (#239) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Reorganize hooks for standards (#237) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Reorganize hooks for standards (#237) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: make ISO-2022-JP encoder perform error state switch (#236) (Wednesday, 21 October)

Andrew Sutherland

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Detecting service worker termination (#1550) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Allow users to collapse shelves together (#115) (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Tuesday, 13 October)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add Imperative Slot API (#860) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add Imperative Slot API (#860) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposal: DOMException.ignoreAborts(promise) (#933) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Support `AbortSignal`s in `addEventListener`s options to unsubscribe from events? (#911) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Should there be a declarative version of adoptedStyleSheets? (#910) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template batch mutations and side effects (#906) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template batch mutations and side effects (#906) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals - Naming for DOM Parts API (#902) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Refactor query state to operate on a buffer (#558) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Refactor query state to operate on a buffer (#558) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Empty innerHTML/textContent in connectedCallback, but the actual content is rendered (#903) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add the ability for an EventTarget to provide an algorithm to override (#366) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add the ability for an EventTarget to provide an algorithm to override (#366) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Refactor query state to operate on a buffer (#558) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Template batch mutations and side effects (#906) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Empty innerHTML/textContent in connectedCallback, but the actual content is rendered (#903) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals - Naming for DOM Parts API (#902) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Empty innerHTML/textContent in connectedCallback, but the actual content is rendered (#903) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals - Naming for DOM Parts API (#902) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Missing comma in a sentence - makes it somewhat confusing to read (#906) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: rephrase initEvent() note (#909) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update CONTRIBUTING.md (#1104) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update CONTRIBUTING.md (#1105) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• [whatwg/dom] Editorial: rephrase initEvent() note (#909) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] NodeIterator's pre-removing steps does not match browsers (#907) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Clarify null "get-the-parent" note (#908) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add some minor clarifications. (#244) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Questionable conversion in BOM Sniff (#243) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Prepending or conversion of a sequence possibly not exact enough explained (#239) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Clarify instance language around decoders and encoders (#241) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Talk about instances of decoders and encoders (#240) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use the network partition key in the CORS-preflight cache (#1101) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Clarify instance language around decoders and encoders (#241) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use the network partition key in the CORS-preflight cache (#1101) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] File URL reparse bug with percent encoded windows drive letter (#559) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use the network partition key in the CORS-preflight cache (#1101) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add some minor clarifications. (#244) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add some minor clarifications. (#244) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add some minor clarifications. (#244) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Clarify instance language around decoders and encoders (#241) (Monday, 26 October)
• [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: consider another name for the run algorithm (#245) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Clarify instance language around decoders and encoders (#241) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] 421 and upload streams (#982) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Questionable conversion in BOM Sniff (#243) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Define size of all storage actions (#110) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Questionable conversion in BOM Sniff (#243) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Questionable conversion in BOM Sniff (#243) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Following your own style guide... (#242) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Clarify instance language around decoders and encoders (#241) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Prepending or conversion of a sequence possibly not exact enough explained (#239) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Clarify instance language around decoders and encoders (#241) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Prepending or conversion of a sequence possibly not exact enough explained (#239) (Friday, 23 October)
• [whatwg/encoding] Clarify instance language around decoders and encoders (#241) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Refactor query state to operate on a buffer (#558) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Encode hook not adequate (#235) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Big5 encoding mishandles some trailing bytes, with possible XSS (#171) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Talk about instances of decoders and encoders (#240) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add more labels to the replacement encoding (#8) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add more labels to the replacement encoding (#8) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Consider adding TextEncoder.containsLoneSurrogates() static (#174) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Friday, 23 October)
• [whatwg/encoding] Talk about instances of decoders and encoders (#240) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Support relative URLs (#531) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Reorganize hooks for standards (#237) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Reorganize hooks for standards (#237) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Reorganize hooks for standards (#237) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Support relative URLs (#531) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] 421 and upload streams (#982) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Refactor query state to operate on a buffer (#558) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Refactor query state to operate on a buffer (#558) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• [whatwg/encoding] Reorganize hooks for standards (#237) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Encode hook not adequate (#235) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Encode hook not adequate (#235) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Encode hook not adequate (#235) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: make ISO-2022-JP encoder perform error state switch (#236) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] 421 and upload streams (#982) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] No documentation on how a server must response to a wrong CORS-headers-request. (#1102) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Refactor query state to operate on a buffer (#558) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: make ISO-2022-JP encoder perform error state switch (#236) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: make ISO-2022-JP encoder perform error state switch (#236) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: make ISO-2022-JP encoder perform error state switch (#236) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: make ISO-2022-JP encoder perform error state switch (#236) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Encode hook not adequate (#235) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: make ISO-2022-JP encoder perform error state switch (#236) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Encode hook not adequate (#235) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• [whatwg/url] Refactor query state to operate on a buffer (#558) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Percent-encoding of query wrong for ISO-2022-JP (#557) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• [whatwg/encoding] Encode hook not adequate (#235) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Deprecating `document.domain`. (#564) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] the urlencoded spec did not described tuples of which the name includes square brackets (#556) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] the urlencoded spec did not described tuples of which the name includes square brackets (#556) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Deprecating `document.domain`. (#564) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• [whatwg/url] Percent-encoding of query wrong for ISO-2022-JP (#557) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should we consider Worklets as clients? (#1502) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should we consider Worklets as clients? (#1502) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] the urlencoded spec did not described tuples of which the name includes square brackets (#556) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define settings object's cross-origin isolated capability for SW (#1545) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Scoped Custom Element Registry: Open Design Issues (#895) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Realm to use for promises (#932) (Thursday, 15 October)
• [heycam/webidl] Realm to use for promises (#932) (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow ports in file URLs (#548) (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow ports in file URLs (#548) (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow ports in file URLs (#548) (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Make it easier to talk about parts of the URL from outside the URL spec (#554) (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] scope pattern matching (#1468) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] scope pattern matching (#1468) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] scope pattern matching (#1468) (Monday, 12 October)
• [whatwg/fetch] Use the network partition key in the CORS-preflight cache (#1101) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow `//` when base exists (#553) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add `ServiceWorkerRegistration.id` and supporting algorithm changes. (Fixes #1512) (#1526) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual Call: pattern matching scopes (#1535) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual Call: pattern matching scopes (#1535) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] scope pattern matching (#1468) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Meta: link Review Draft (#187) (Sunday, 11 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Some tweaks for traverse algo and others (#87) (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] TPAC 2020: Storage Standard meeting interest (#113) (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Some tweaks for traverse algo and others (#87) (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] File URL reparse issue (#549) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Thursday, 8 October)
• [w3c/DOM-Parsing] createContextualFragment() should do adopt node or some such (#65) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add NodeList.setAttributes (#895) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Add details to host and path setters (#551) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add NodeList.setAttributes (#895) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define settings object's cross-origin isolated capability for SW (#1545) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define settings object's cross-origin isolated capability for SW (#1545) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define settings object's cross-origin isolated capability for SW (#1545) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] 421 and upload streams (#982) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Be more vague about UI guidelines (#109) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Meta: link Review Draft (#114) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Minor correction to a tool script: raise does not work like print (#234) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Some tweaks for traverse algo and others (#87) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Minor correction to a tool script: raise does not work like print (#234) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] [shadow-dom] Why does attributeChangedCallback fire before connectedCallback during parsing? (#899) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] [shadow-dom] Why does attributeChangedCallback fire before connectedCallback during parsing? (#899) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow ports in file URLs (#548) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] 421 and upload streams (#982) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] can't parse urls starting with xn-- (#438) (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] can't parse urls starting with xn-- (#438) (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Be more vague about UI guidelines (#109) (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Meta: put custom element acknowledgment in the IPR section (#898) (Thursday, 1 October)

Anssi Kostiainen

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebHID API (Human Interface Device) (#370) (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] TPAC planning and specification status report (#906) (Thursday, 1 October)

ArkadiuszMichalski

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Some tweaks for traverse algo and others (#87) (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Some tweaks for traverse algo and others (#87) (Tuesday, 6 October)

autokagami

• Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Editorial: Align with Web IDL specification (#200) (Sunday, 18 October)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Editorial: Align with Web IDL specification (#66) (Sunday, 18 October)

Ayu Ishii

• Re: [whatwg/storage] TPAC 2020: Storage Standard meeting interest (#113) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Storage Buckets API (#562) (Wednesday, 7 October)

Ben Kelly

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual Call: pattern matching scopes (#1535) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] scope pattern matching (#1468) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] scope pattern matching (#1468) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] scope pattern matching (#1468) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] scope pattern matching (#1468) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] scope pattern matching (#1468) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] scope pattern matching (#1468) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] scope pattern matching (#1468) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] TPAC 2020: Storage Standard meeting interest (#113) (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual Call: pattern matching scopes (#1535) (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual Call: pattern matching scopes (#1535) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handing fetch termination (#1178) (Wednesday, 7 October)

Benjamin Gruenbaum

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Support `AbortSignal`s in `addEventListener`s options to unsubscribe from events? (#911) (Thursday, 29 October)
• [whatwg/dom] Support `AbortSignal`s in `addEventListener`s options to unsubscribe from events? (#911) (Thursday, 29 October)
• [whatwg/dom] Clarify null "get-the-parent" note (#908) (Tuesday, 27 October)

Benny Powers

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] implement a polyfill of template-instantiation before even considering to add the API natively to the platform (#702) (Monday, 26 October)

Bo Cupp

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] VirtualKeyboard API - show/hide policy (#498) (Saturday, 17 October)

Bradley Farias

• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)

Bruce B. Anderson

• [w3c/webcomponents] An alternative lazy custom element definition proposal -- conditionalImport (#896) (Friday, 16 October)

bryan rasmussen

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)

Chris Dumez

• Re: [whatwg/dom] replaceChildren contains a step that is incorrect when node is null (#901) (Saturday, 10 October)

Chris Wilson

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Blink Shipping Process (#516) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Blink Shipping Process (#516) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Blink Shipping Process (#516) (Monday, 5 October)

Christian Liebel

• Re: [w3c/manifest] badge purpose "monochrome" is only supported by Firefox (#905) (Monday, 26 October)

Cure53

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)

cynthia

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] User Idle Detection (#336) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebRTC-SVC (Scalable Video Coding) (#396) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebRTC-SVC (Scalable Video Coding) (#396) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebHID API (Human Interface Device) (#370) (Thursday, 1 October)

Cătălin Mariș

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Help network hacked (#1103) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "target " (#904) (Tuesday, 20 October)

Daijiro Wachi

• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow `//` when base exists (#553) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow `//` when base exists (#553) (Sunday, 11 October)
• [whatwg/url] Allow `//` when base exists (#553) (Saturday, 10 October)

Dan Clark

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] define behavior of `@import` in Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) modules (#870) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] 2020 Virtual TPAC F2F (#877) (Thursday, 15 October)

Dan Fabulich

• Re: [whatwg/dom] What is the "security policy" for adding new events and elements to the Web Platform? (#913) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 7 October)

Daniel Appelquist

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebXR Hit Test Module (#463) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebRTC Priority Control API (#560) (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebXR Anchors Module (#479) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] VirtualKeyboard API - show/hide policy (#498) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Referrer handling - default policy and capping (#538) (Monday, 12 October)

Daniel Murphy

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding field `display_override` to the manifest (#932) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding field `display_override` to the manifest (#932) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding field `display_override` to the manifest (#932) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding field `display_override` to the manifest (#932) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding field `display_override` to the manifest (#932) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding field `display_override` to the manifest (#932) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] TPAC planning and specification status report (#906) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] TPAC planning and specification status report (#906) (Monday, 19 October)

Danny Engelman

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Empty innerHTML/textContent in connectedCallback, but the actual content is rendered (#903) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Empty innerHTML/textContent in connectedCallback, but the actual content is rendered (#903) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allowing CSS combinators postfixed to the ::slotted() selector (#889) (Saturday, 10 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allowing CSS combinators postfixed to the ::slotted() selector (#889) (Wednesday, 7 October)

Danyao Wang

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Secure Payment Confirmation (#544) (Wednesday, 7 October)

Darien Maillet Valentine

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposal: DOMException.ignoreAborts(promise) (#933) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposal: DOMException.ignoreAborts(promise) (#933) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] replaceChildren contains a step that is incorrect when node is null (#901) (Saturday, 10 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "::slotted" pseudo elements (#331) (Wednesday, 7 October)

Darin Adler

• Re: [whatwg/dom] replaceChildren contains a step that is incorrect when node is null (#901) (Sunday, 11 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] replaceChildren contains a step that is incorrect when node is null (#901) (Sunday, 11 October)
• [whatwg/dom] replaceChildren contains a step that is incorrect when node is null (#901) (Saturday, 10 October)

Darwin Huang

• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Remove clipboard-read permission (#132) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] TPAC planning and specification status report (#124) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Remove clipboard-read permission (#132) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] TPAC planning and specification status report (#124) (Wednesday, 14 October)

Devon Govett

• Re: [w3c/uievents] Expose 'direction-inversion' in wheel events (#57) (Thursday, 29 October)

Dmitry IV.

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [declarative-custom-elements] shorter syntax (#885) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Empty innerHTML/textContent in connectedCallback, but the actual content is rendered (#903) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Empty innerHTML in connectedCallback, but content is (#903) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How to handle expressions in tables (#703) (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [declarative-custom-elements] shorter syntax (#885) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: add `childFilter` option to `MutationObserverInit` (#905) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: add `children` option to `MutationObserverInit` (#905) (Wednesday, 21 October)

Domenic Denicola

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposal: DOMException.ignoreAborts(promise) (#933) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposal: DOMException.ignoreAborts(promise) (#933) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposal: DOMException.ignoreAborts(promise) (#933) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Adding a return value to `controller.abort()` which represents abort completion (#881) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Adding a return value to `controller.abort()` which represents abort completion (#881) (Thursday, 29 October)
• [heycam/webidl] Proposal: DOMException.ignoreAborts(promise) (#933) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Support `AbortSignal`s in `addEventListener`s options to unsubscribe from events? (#911) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add Explainer for Byte Streams (#1081) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Fix readable byte stream example (#1080) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals - Naming for DOM Parts API (#902) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Add lock options to requestPointerLock (#49) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Refactor query state to operate on a buffer (#558) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Refactor query state to operate on a buffer (#558) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Define that interface objects are constructors (#698) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Refactor query state to operate on a buffer (#558) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Deprecating `document.domain`. (#564) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add Imperative Slot API (#860) (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Realm to use for promises (#932) (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Realm to use for promises (#932) (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow ports in file URLs (#548) (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] TPAC 2020: Fetch Standard meeting interest (#1082) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Define "has event listener" operation (#453) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow `//` when base exists (#553) (Saturday, 10 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] HAMED (#930) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define settings object's cross-origin isolated capability for SW (#1545) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define settings object's cross-origin isolated capability for SW (#1545) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Expose shadowRoot on element internals (#871) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add is-available-to-element-internals (#893) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add is-available-to-element-internals (#893) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add is-available-to-element-internals (#893) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Add lock options to requestPointerLock (#49) (Friday, 2 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Editorial: Add lt="reading a chunk" (#1079) (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Editorial: Add lt="reading a chunk" (#1079) (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] can't parse urls starting with xn-- (#438) (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Editorial: Define "create a ReadableStream" instead of just "create" (#1078) (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Editorial: Add lt="reading a chunk" (#1079) (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Editorial: Define "create a ReadableStream" instead of just "create" (#1078) (Thursday, 1 October)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Monday, 19 October)

Donsdon

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Fix #556, make focus navigation work when shadow host's tabindex is -1 (#557) (Sunday, 25 October)

Drafu

• [whatwg/fetch] No documentation on how a server must response to a wrong CORS-headers-request. (#1102) (Tuesday, 20 October)

Ehsan Toreini

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebHID API (Human Interface Device) (#370) (Monday, 26 October)

Eli Gancena

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [DOM Parts] Fix typo (#900) (Tuesday, 27 October)

Emanuel H. Farias

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Declarative components proposal (#897) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Declarative components proposal (#897) (Friday, 23 October)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Declarative components proposal (#897) (Tuesday, 20 October)

Emanuel Krivoy

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review of NativeIO (#566) (Wednesday, 28 October)

Emilio Cobos Álvarez

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] define behavior of `@import` in Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) modules (#870) (Friday, 30 October)

Eric Portis

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)

EveryOS

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: rephrase initEvent() note (#909) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• [whatwg/dom] Missing comma in a sentence - makes it somewhat confusing to read (#906) (Monday, 26 October)

ExE Boss

• [heycam/webidl] Normative: Match ECMA‑262 order of the `constructor` property (#934) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] How should "everything after the scheme" URLs work? (#385) (Monday, 5 October)

fantasai

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review of CSS Sizing 3 (#565) (Friday, 23 October)
• [whatwg/url] Make it easier to talk about parts of the URL from outside the URL spec (#554) (Tuesday, 13 October)

Felipe Erias

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] CSS Scrollbars: scrollbar-color, scrollbar-width (#563) (Friday, 16 October)

fernando-80

• Re: [w3c/gamepad] adding multitouch extension (#142) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Add gamepad light indicator extension (#143) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Add gamepad light indicator extension (#143) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Add gamepad light indicator extension (#143) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Add gamepad light indicator extension (#143) (Thursday, 29 October)
• [w3c/gamepad] Add gamepad light indicator extension (#143) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] adding multitouch extension (#142) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] adding multitouch extension (#142) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] adding multitouch extension (#142) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] adding multitouch extension (#142) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] adding multitouch extension (#142) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] adding multitouch extension (#142) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] adding multitouch extension (#142) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] adding multitouch extension (#142) (Thursday, 15 October)
• [w3c/gamepad] adding multitouch extension (#142) (Thursday, 15 October)

Frank Lemanschik

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 6 October)

Glen

• Re: [w3c/manifest] badge purpose "monochrome" is only supported by Firefox (#905) (Tuesday, 27 October)

Guy Bedford

• [whatwg/url] Proposal: file: URL separator deduplication (#552) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)

hamed19901411

• [heycam/webidl] HAMED (#930) (Thursday, 8 October)

HarJIT

• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Minor correction to a tool script: raise does not work like print (#234) (Monday, 5 October)
• [whatwg/encoding] Minor correction to a tool script: raise does not work like print (#234) (Sunday, 4 October)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Big5 encoding mishandles some trailing bytes, with possible XSS (#171) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Big5 encoding mishandles some trailing bytes, with possible XSS (#171) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Reorganize hooks for standards (#237) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Encode hook not adequate (#235) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: make ISO-2022-JP encoder perform error state switch (#236) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: make ISO-2022-JP encoder perform error state switch (#236) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: make ISO-2022-JP encoder perform error state switch (#236) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: make ISO-2022-JP encoder perform error state switch (#236) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Encode hook not adequate (#235) (Tuesday, 20 October)

hober

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] HR review of IMSC 1.2 FPWD (#474) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] URL Protocol Handler Registration for PWAs (#482) (Monday, 12 October)
• [heycam/webidl] Meet at or around TPAC? (#931) (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] TPAC 2020: Storage Standard meeting interest (#113) (Friday, 9 October)

Ian Clelland

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Deprecating `document.domain`. (#564) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Deprecating `document.domain`. (#564) (Monday, 19 October)

inoas

• Re: [whatwg/dom] [Declarative Shadow DOM] How should we build the "opt-in" for fragment parsing of declarative Shadow DOM? (#912) (Saturday, 31 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] What is the "security policy" for adding new events and elements to the Web Platform? (#913) (Saturday, 31 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)

Jake Archibald

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Wednesday, 7 October)

James

• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Add lock options to requestPointerLock (#49) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Add lock options to requestPointerLock (#49) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Add lock options to requestPointerLock (#49) (Wednesday, 21 October)

James Addison

• Re: [whatwg/url] Proposal of .toString({ concise: true }) for nicer output with empty values (#469) (Sunday, 18 October)

Jason Miller

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add NodeList.setAttributes (#895) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add NodeList.setAttributes (#895) (Tuesday, 6 October)

Jeffrey Posnick

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Friday, 2 October)

Jeffrey Yasskin

• Re: [whatwg/url] Support relative URLs (#531) (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Editorial: Define "create a ReadableStream" instead of just "create" (#1078) (Thursday, 1 October)
• [whatwg/streams] Editorial: Add lt="reading a chunk" (#1079) (Thursday, 1 October)
• [whatwg/streams] Editorial: Define "create a ReadableStream" instead of just "create" (#1078) (Thursday, 1 October)

Jimmy Wärting

• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Report unsupported data types that were on the clipboard? (#129) (Sunday, 25 October)

Joe Pea

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Disconnect single target instead of all (#126) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Returning a Proxy from a Custom Element constructor (#857) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] [shadow-dom] Why does attributeChangedCallback fire before connectedCallback during parsing? (#899) (Saturday, 3 October)
• [whatwg/dom] [shadow-dom] Why does attributeChangedCallback fire before connectedCallback during parsing? (#899) (Saturday, 3 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Saturday, 3 October)

Joey Arhar

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Beforematch event (#511) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Beforematch event (#511) (Friday, 2 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Beforematch event (#511) (Friday, 2 October)

John Cowan

• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Thursday, 22 October)

Joshua Bell

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Use infra sorting definitions (#346) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Use infra sorting definitions (#346) (Thursday, 8 October)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Use infra sorting definitions (#346) (Thursday, 8 October)

Julien Cayzac

• Re: [w3c/permissions] Gauging interest in a Permission Handler API? (#224) (Thursday, 15 October)
• [w3c/permissions] Gauging interest in a Permission Handler API? (#224) (Thursday, 15 October)

Jungkee Song

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Monday, 5 October)

Justin Fagnani

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [declarative-custom-elements] shorter syntax (#885) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template batch mutations and side effects (#906) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals - Naming for DOM Parts API (#902) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Scoped Custom Element Registry: Open Design Issues (#895) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Declarative components proposal (#897) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Thursday, 15 October)

Kagami Sascha Rosylight

• Re: [w3c/uievents] Converge with CSSOM-View (#24) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Converge with CSSOM-View (#24) (Sunday, 25 October)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerContainer's message event is incorrectly linked to ServiceWorkerGlobalScope event list (#1549) (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Use `undefined` union type for getRegistration() (#1548) (Saturday, 24 October)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Use `undefined` union type for getRegistration() (#1548) (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Editorial: Align with Web IDL specification (#200) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Editorial: Align with Web IDL specification (#200) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Remove clipboard-read permission (#132) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• [heycam/webidl] Add [Historical] extended attribute (#929) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• [w3c/gamepad] Define ongamepaddisconnected/ongamepaddisconnected attributes (#141) (Friday, 2 October)

Karl Tomlinson

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Realm to use for promises (#932) (Monday, 19 October)

Kenneth Rohde Christiansen

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals - Naming for DOM Parts API (#902) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• [w3c/webcomponents] DOM Parts: Fix minor issues (#905) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Codespace 1 (#904) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Codespace 1 (#904) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Beforematch event (#511) (Tuesday, 13 October)

Krzysztof Kotowicz

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)

Larry Masinter

• Re: [whatwg/url] Support relative URLs (#531) (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] the urlencoded spec did not described tuples of which the name includes square brackets (#556) (Sunday, 18 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Changes to file URL path normalization (#544) (Monday, 5 October)

Lea Verou

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] observedStyles (#856) (Wednesday, 14 October)

Leo Balter

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] RfC: An alternative approach to accessibility across shadow boundaries (#898) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Scoped Custom Element Registry: Open Design Issues (#895) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Thursday, 15 October)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Spec Review: Open Design Issues (#895) (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Realms API ECMAScript Proposal (#542) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Realms API ECMAScript Proposal (#542) (Wednesday, 7 October)

Liam Quin

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)

litbear

• Re: [whatwg/url] the urlencoded spec did not described tuples of which the name includes square brackets (#556) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] the urlencoded spec did not described tuples of which the name includes square brackets (#556) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• [whatwg/url] the urlencoded spec did not described tuples of which the name includes square brackets (#556) (Sunday, 18 October)

Lonnie Best

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allowing CSS combinators postfixed to the ::slotted() selector (#889) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allowing CSS combinators postfixed to the ::slotted() selector (#889) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "::slotted" pseudo elements (#331) (Wednesday, 7 October)

Lukasz Olejnik

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review Request - Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v1.0 (#556) (Friday, 2 October)

Makoto Shimazu

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Monday, 5 October)

mandy

• [w3c/ServiceWorker] unable to open https://wicg.github.io/cookie-store/ (#1547) (Monday, 19 October)

Marcelo Volmaro

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Feature: Open shortcuts on the already open app (#937) (Wednesday, 14 October)
• [w3c/manifest] Feature: Open shortcuts on the already open app (#937) (Wednesday, 14 October)

Marcos Cáceres

• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Restrict getGamepads() to [SecureContext] (#113) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Require secure context for gamepad state and events (#120) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Require secure context for gamepad state and events (#120) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Feature policy integration (#119) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Add permission policy integration (#112) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Add gamepad light indicator extension (#143) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Add gamepad light indicator extension (#143) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] adding multitouch extension (#142) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] adding multitouch extension (#142) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] adding multitouch extension (#142) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] adding multitouch extension (#142) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] adding multitouch extension (#142) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Is "clipboard" permission replaced by "clipboard-read" and "clipboard-write"? (#101) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Remove clipboard-read permission (#132) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Remove clipboard-read permission (#132) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add a unique identifier for a PWA (#586) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Support a way to update explicitly (#446) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Remove clipboard-read permission (#132) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Remove clipboard-read permission (#132) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Remove clipboard-read permission (#132) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] "activation triggering input event" no longer a thing (#67) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Editorial: Align with Web IDL specification (#200) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] TPAC planning and specification status report (#906) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Could you review Chrome/Firefox implementation regarding `fullscreen` display mode on Mac? (#934) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Related applications parsing is incorrect (#936) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix related_applications parsing instructions (#933) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix related_applications parsing instructions (#933) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix related_applications parsing instructions (#933) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] chore(ci): use the spec-prod GitHub action (#935) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] TPAC planning and specification status report (#137) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Define ongamepaddisconnected/ongamepaddisconnected attributes (#141) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] TPAC planning and specification status report (#124) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] TPAC planning and specification status report (#156) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] TPAC planning and specification status report (#137) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] TPAC planning and specification status report (#64) (Monday, 19 October)
• [w3c/pointerlock] "activation triggering input event" no longer a thing (#67) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Editorial: Align with Web IDL specification (#66) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Editorial: Align with Web IDL specification (#66) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] TPAC planning and specification status report (#199) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web Share API review (#554) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Define ongamepaddisconnected/ongamepaddisconnected attributes (#141) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Define ongamepaddisconnected/ongamepaddisconnected attributes (#141) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Why does obtaining not check a MIME type? (#821) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [w3c/push-api] TPAC planning and specification status report (#326) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Meta: wide-review tracker (#265) (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Meta: wide-review tracker (#265) (Thursday, 1 October)

Marijn Kruisselbrink

• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] TPAC planning and specification status report (#156) (Monday, 19 October)

Mark Davis

• Re: [whatwg/url] can't parse urls starting with xn-- (#438) (Thursday, 1 October)

Markus Scherer

• Re: [whatwg/url] can't parse urls starting with xn-- (#438) (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] can't parse urls starting with xn-- (#438) (Thursday, 1 October)

Martin Janecke

• Re: [whatwg/dom] [Declarative Shadow DOM] How should we build the "opt-in" for fragment parsing of declarative Shadow DOM? (#912) (Saturday, 31 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 7 October)

Martin Middel

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Wednesday, 14 October)

Martin Thomson

• Re: [w3c/push-api] TPAC planning and specification status report (#326) (Wednesday, 7 October)

Martynas Jusevičius

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Monday, 26 October)

masa

• [whatwg/dom] "target " (#904) (Tuesday, 20 October)

Masataka Yakura

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Tuesday, 27 October)

Mason Freed

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Friday, 30 October)
• [whatwg/dom] What is the "security policy" for adding new events and elements to the Web Platform? (#913) (Friday, 30 October)
• [whatwg/dom] [Declarative Shadow DOM] How should we build the "opt-in" for fragment parsing of declarative Shadow DOM? (#912) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Should there be a declarative version of adoptedStyleSheets? (#910) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] define behavior of `@import` in Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) modules (#870) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add NodeList.setAttributes (#895) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Should there be a declarative version of adoptedStyleSheets? (#910) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• [whatwg/dom] Should there be a declarative version of adoptedStyleSheets? (#910) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Declarative Shadow DOM (#494) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add NodeList.setAttributes (#895) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Expose shadowRoot on element internals (#871) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add is-available-to-element-internals (#893) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] 2020 Virtual TPAC F2F (10/26-10/30) (#877) (Friday, 2 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] 2020 Virtual TPAC F2F (10/26-10/30) (#877) (Thursday, 1 October)

Matt Falkenhagen

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Virtual calls around TPAC time (#1536) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] `Vary` and requests added below the SW (#1542) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] "no-cors" CSS SOP violation (#719) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] "no-cors" CSS SOP violation (#719) (Friday, 16 October)

Matt Giuca

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding field `display_override` to the manifest (#932) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] badge purpose "monochrome" is only supported by Firefox (#905) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Could you review Chrome/Firefox implementation regarding `fullscreen` display mode on Mac? (#934) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web Share API review (#554) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] making the "total" field optional in PaymentRequest API (#512) (Monday, 12 October)

Matt Menke

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use the network partition key in the CORS-preflight cache (#1101) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use the network partition key in the CORS-preflight cache (#1101) (Monday, 26 October)

Matt Reynolds

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebHID API (Human Interface Device) (#370) (Thursday, 1 October)

Matthew Paul Matherne

• [whatwg/fetch] #=##. (#1100) (Tuesday, 6 October)

Mattias Buelens

• Re: [whatwg/streams] Fix readable byte stream example (#1080) (Tuesday, 27 October)

Michael Coughlin

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Define cloning steps for an select element (#644) (Wednesday, 21 October)

Michael Stramel

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)

Michael[tm] Smith

• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) (Tuesday, 20 October)

Michail Schwab

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add NodeList.setAttributes (#895) (Thursday, 22 October)

Mike West

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Deprecating `document.domain`. (#564) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Deprecating `document.domain`. (#564) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Deprecating `document.domain`. (#564) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Deprecating `document.domain`. (#564) (Monday, 19 October)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Deprecating `document.domain`. (#564) (Monday, 19 October)

Mustaq Ahmed

• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] "activation triggering input event" no longer a thing (#67) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] TPAC planning and specification status report (#64) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] "activation triggering input event" no longer a thing (#67) (Monday, 19 October)

Nick Savrov

• Re: [w3c/permissions] Media autoplay permission (#150) (Friday, 23 October)

Nidhi Jaju

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Byte Streams (#567) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add Explainer for Byte Streams (#1081) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add Explainer for Byte Streams (#1081) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add Explainer for Byte Streams (#1081) (Thursday, 29 October)
• [whatwg/streams] Add Explainer for Byte Streams (#1081) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Fix readable byte stream example (#1080) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Fix readable byte stream example (#1080) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Fix readable byte stream example (#1080) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Fix readable byte stream example (#1080) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• [whatwg/streams] Fix readable byte stream example (#1080) (Tuesday, 27 October)

npm1

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] hasDroppedEntry in PerformanceObserverCallback (#547) (Wednesday, 21 October)

OTG-Zerify

• [whatwg/url] play.geforcenow.com/mall/ (#555) (Friday, 16 October)

Peter Linss

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] HR review of IMSC 1.2 FPWD (#474) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] HR review of IMSC 1.2 FPWD (#474) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] CSS page-orientation descriptor (#515) (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Blink Shipping Process (#516) (Monday, 12 October)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Meta: link Review Draft (#187) (Friday, 9 October)

Pierre Ossman (Work account)

• [whatwg/dom] Dead key symbols not included in KeyboardEvent (#900) (Wednesday, 7 October)

quechi199900

• [whatwg/fetch] Help (#1098) (Saturday, 3 October)

Ram Lodhi

• [w3c/ServiceWorker] <object> having issue with service workers registration, failing with error message Service worker registration failed with: DOMException: Failed to register a ServiceWorker: The document is in an invalid state. (#1546) (Tuesday, 13 October)

Rashadtr27

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use the network partition key in the CORS-preflight cache (#1101) (Wednesday, 14 October)

Reilly Grant

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] User Idle Detection (#336) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Add lock options to requestPointerLock (#49) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Feature: Open shortcuts on the already open app (#937) (Wednesday, 14 October)

rektide

• [whatwg/storage] Allow users to collapse shelves (#115) (Saturday, 24 October)

Rimas Misevičius

• Re: [whatwg/url] File URL reparse bug with percent encoded windows drive letter (#559) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] File URL reparse bug with percent encoded windows drive letter (#559) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] File URL reparse bug with percent encoded windows drive letter (#559) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• [whatwg/url] File URL reparse bug with percent encoded windows drive letter (#559) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• [whatwg/url] Fix file URL reparse issue (#550) (Monday, 5 October)
• [whatwg/url] File URL reparse issue (#549) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] can't parse urls starting with xn-- (#438) (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [whatwg/url] can't parse urls starting with xn-- (#438) (Thursday, 1 October)

RiNaT059-TaT

• [whatwg/fetch] Update CONTRIBUTING.md (#1105) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• [whatwg/fetch] Update CONTRIBUTING.md (#1104) (Tuesday, 27 October)

Rob Eisenberg

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals - Naming for DOM Parts API (#902) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Tuesday, 27 October)

Robert White (Vix)

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom 'void' or self-closing elements (HTML parser changes) (#624) (Saturday, 31 October)

Ryosuke Niwa

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] DOM Parts: Fix minor issues (#905) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] DOM Parts: Fix minor issues (#905) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals - Naming for DOM Parts API (#902) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Empty innerHTML/textContent in connectedCallback, but the actual content is rendered (#903) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Empty innerHTML/textContent in connectedCallback, but the actual content is rendered (#903) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Empty innerHTML/textContent in connectedCallback, but the actual content is rendered (#903) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [DOM Parts] Fix typo (#900) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [DOM Parts] Fix typo (#900) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [DOM Parts] Fix typo (#900) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Ensure that template instantiation actually improves the platform (#704) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Remove clipboard-read permission (#132) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] RfC: An alternative approach to accessibility across shadow boundaries (#898) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• [w3c/webcomponents] RfC: An alternative approach to accessibility across shadow boundaries (#898) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Remove clipboard-read permission (#132) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] TPAC planning and specification status report (#122) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components-related breakouts @ TPAC 2020 (#877) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] VirtualKeyboard API - show/hide policy (#498) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] 2020 Virtual TPAC F2F (10/26-10/30) (#877) (Friday, 2 October)

sergeykish

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Thursday, 15 October)

Serhii Kulykov

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] implement a polyfill of template-instantiation before even considering to add the API natively to the platform (#702) (Monday, 26 October)

Seth Holladay

• Re: [whatwg/url] Support relative URLs (#531) (Thursday, 22 October)

Shawn Zivontsis

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)

Shiino Yuki

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposal: DOMException.ignoreAborts(promise) (#933) (Thursday, 29 October)

Simon Jackson

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Constant bitrate audio encoding with MediaRecorder (#540) (Tuesday, 13 October)

Simon Pieters

• Re: [w3c/uievents] Converge with CSSOM-View (#24) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Converge with CSSOM-View (#24) (Tuesday, 27 October)

simondrabble

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Replaying POST requests (#693) (Sunday, 25 October)

sleevi

• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow ports in file URLs (#548) (Wednesday, 14 October)

smaug----

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Tuesday, 27 October)

Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Saturday, 31 October)

Tiger Oakes

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding field `display_override` to the manifest (#932) (Friday, 30 October)

Timothy Gu

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Update obsolete note on duplicate Proxy [[OwnPropertyKeys]] entries (#925) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Update obsolete note on duplicate Proxy [[OwnPropertyKeys]] entries (#925) (Friday, 16 October)

Tom Hillman

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal - Update XPath to (at least) v2.0 (#903) (Tuesday, 13 October)

Trevor Rowbotham

• [whatwg/dom] NodeIterator's pre-removing steps does not match browsers (#907) (Monday, 26 October)

Wolf Lammen

• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add some minor clarifications. (#244) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Questionable conversion in BOM Sniff (#243) (Monday, 26 October)
• [whatwg/encoding] Questionable conversion in BOM Sniff (#243) (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Prepending or conversion of a sequence possibly not exact enough explained (#239) (Saturday, 24 October)
• [whatwg/encoding] Following your own style guide... (#242) (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Prepending or conversion of a sequence possibly not exact enough explained (#239) (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Prepending or conversion of a sequence possibly not exact enough explained (#239) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Prepending or conversion of a sequence possibly not exact enough explained (#239) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Prepending or conversion of a sequence possibly not exact enough explained (#239) (Friday, 23 October)
• [whatwg/encoding] Prepending or conversion of a sequence possibly not exact enough explained (#239) (Thursday, 22 October)

Yoav Weiss

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] `Vary` and requests added below the SW (#1542) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Thursday, 1 October)

Yoichi Osato

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] 421 and upload streams (#982) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] 421 and upload streams (#982) (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] 421 and upload streams (#982) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] 421 and upload streams (#982) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] 421 and upload streams (#982) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] 421 and upload streams (#982) (Friday, 2 October)

youennf

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Sunday, 18 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] "no-cors" CSS SOP violation (#719) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] scope pattern matching (#1468) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing a non-scope identifier for registrations (#1512) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] scope pattern matching (#1468) (Monday, 12 October)

Yutaka Hirano

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define settings object's cross-origin isolated capability for SW (#1545) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define settings object's cross-origin isolated capability for SW (#1545) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define settings object's cross-origin isolated capability for SW (#1545) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define settings object's cross-origin isolated capability for SW (#1545) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define settings object's cross-origin isolated capability for SW (#1545) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define settings object's cross-origin isolated capability for SW (#1545) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define settings object's cross-origin isolated capability for SW (#1545) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define settings object's cross-origin isolated capability for SW (#1545) (Monday, 5 October)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define settings object's cross-origin isolated capability for SW (#1545) (Monday, 5 October)

YuuyaSatsuki

• [whatwg/xhr] あ (#293) (Monday, 5 October)

yuzhehan

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add NodeList.setAttributes (#895) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template batch mutations and side effects (#906) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals - Naming for DOM Parts API (#902) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals should explain how and why they improve performance (#901) (Wednesday, 28 October)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Template/part proposals - Naming for DOM Parts API (#902) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an updated proposal for DOM Parts. (#899) (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add Imperative Slot API (#860) (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add Imperative Slot API (#860) (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add Imperative Slot API (#860) (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add Imperative Slot API (#860) (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add Imperative Slot API (#860) (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add Imperative Slot API (#860) (Thursday, 15 October)

Yves Lafon

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebXR Anchors Module (#479) (Tuesday, 13 October)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 October 2020 20:45:21 UTC