- From: Ben Kelly <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 08:14:35 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 12 October 2020 15:14:49 UTC
Ok. If its consistent with URLPattern, though, how does that improve the concern about developer expectations? FWIW, after your comment at the meeting I am leaning towards exposing a URLPathnamePattern that only deals with pathname matching that service workers could use instead of the full URLPattern. (I haven't gotten to writing up that action item as an issue yet.) I guess I don't have a strong opinion if service workers takes a string and internally create a URLPathnamePattern or if the developer passes one in. I guess ideally it would be nice to accept either. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1468#issuecomment-707180874
Received on Monday, 12 October 2020 15:14:49 UTC