Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] scope pattern matching (#1468)

I think there is something to that argument, but I wonder if we could still reuse the syntax and underlying model. And just have a different API entry point for them focused exclusively on service worker scopes.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1468#issuecomment-707032064

Received on Monday, 12 October 2020 10:24:24 UTC