- From: Andrea Giammarchi <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:39:37 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2020 19:39:49 UTC
@liamquin thanks a lot for the clarification, and *yes*, that makes sense. However, if XPath 3 is more problematic than 2, in terms of possible footgun within the parsing and features, I think having v2 available in JS would already be a *killer feature* compared to 1, and since nobody wants new footguns in JS, upgrading to the least problematic version that provides `matches` and `replace` (which is also in v2 IIRC), would enable a whole new world of possibilities that fit into a well known selector, instead of spanning in some CSS selector, plus JS checks, plus anything else that might result in more errors than features, for the platform. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/903#issuecomment-707964892
Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2020 19:39:49 UTC