Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] scope pattern matching (#1468)

> There is higher expectation with more focused types than base types like strings.

I don't agree with this if we want developers to expect the strings to exactly match what the formal type takes.  It seems we could easily make the API take either the string or the object.  Its just syntactic sugar at that point.

Anyway, once I write my thinking on the path specific change I'll come back and link here.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1468#issuecomment-707198521