[w3ctag/design-reviews] Review of CSS Sizing 3 (#565)

HIQaH! QaH! TAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of CSS Sizing Level 3.

This CSS module defines the various sizing properties and concepts used throughout CSS. New features since CSS2 are summarized in  https://www.w3.org/TR/css-sizing-3/#changes-3


  - Explainer¹ (minimally containing user needs and example code): None
  - Specification URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-sizing-3/

  - Tests: throughout the CSS WPT repo
  - Security and Privacy self-review²: The only relevant concern seems to be that content-based sizes can expose information about the contents of an element via the size.
  - GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues

  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification): @fantasai and @tabatkins (editors)
  - Organization(s)/project(s) driving the specification: CSSWG
  - Key pieces of existing multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: Nothing particularly exciting, just an interminably long list of issues from everyone working on CSS layout since ~2000.
  - External status/issue trackers for this specification (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status): Unaware of any meta tracking, just individual bugs. If you really want me to triage all the engine's sizing bugs so I can list them all here, please ask for that work explicitly as I'd rather not spend a few months on it if it's not required.

Further details:

  - [tl;dr but I promise to review it once you put it on w3.org] I have reviewed the TAG's [API Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/) 
  - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: aiming to transition to CR this year
  - The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: CSSWG
  - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5650

  - This work is being funded by: Google, previously also Mozilla

You should also know that... Can't think of anything.

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):

  🐛 open issues in our GitHub repo for **each point of feedback**



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/565