Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] scope pattern matching (#1468)

I think the different API endpoint that only deals with a subset makes it quite clear to developers that it's not a `URLPattern`. It might not help with differences in path syntax though, but at least there is no suggestion your scope could encompass other origins.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1468#issuecomment-707190841

Received on Monday, 12 October 2020 15:31:43 UTC