[w3ctag/design-reviews] Review of NativeIO (#566)

HIQaH! QaH! TAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of NativeIO.

NativeIO is a storage API that resembles a very basic filesystem, with direct access to stored data through buffers and offsets. Our goal is to give developers flexibility by providing generic, simple, and performant primitives upon which they can build higher-level components. It's particularly well suited for Wasm-based libraries and applications that want to use custom storage algorithms to fine-tune execution speed and memory usage.

  - Explainer: https://github.com/fivedots/nativeio-explainer/blob/master/README.md

  - Security and Privacy self-review: https://github.com/fivedots/nativeio-explainer/blob/master/security-self-review.md

  - GitHub repo: https://github.com/fivedots/nativeio-explainer/

  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):
      - Emanuel Krivoy (@fivedots), Google Inc., specifier / implementer
      - Richard Stotz (@rstz), Google Inc., specifier / implementer
  - Organization/project driving the design: Chromium
  - External status/issue trackers for this feature: https://chromestatus.com/guide/edit/5670244905385984


Further details:

  - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [API Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/)
  - The group where the incubation/design work on this is being done (or is intended to be done in the future): WICG
  - The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done ("unknown" if not known): unknown
  - Existing major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this design: https://github.com/fivedots/nativeio-explainer/issues

  - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this design: none
  - This work is being funded by: Google Inc.

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as:

  🐛 open issues in our GitHub repo for **each point of feedback**


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/566