Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add get an encoder and encode or fail for URLs (#238)

I thought of an alternative that seems slightly nicer, which is that we push the error itself into the output I/O queue. That still gives the caller freedom to deal with errors in whatever way they want, but preserves the existing contract of encode (other than having to pass a different error mode) and avoids having to hand out encoders. And if the remaining caller of encode really is text/plain (I need to double check that) it might well make sense to do away with "html" entirely.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/pull/238#issuecomment-714276044