- From: Jason Miller <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 06:24:17 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2020 13:24:29 UTC
Sounds reasonable. Before I create an issue, I wanted to double check: if the goal is multi-set performance primitive, maybe both cases could be covered by a separate lock/commit style API? Something like `requestAtomicUpdate(fn, [...affectedNodes])`? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/895#issuecomment-704933051
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2020 13:24:29 UTC