public-w3process@w3.org from November 2014 by subject

Action Items for Process

ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules; Respond by December 8, 2014

Agenda Process Document Task Force 25 November 2014

Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 11 November, 2014

Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 18 November, 2014

CfC: Close ISSUE-146

Draft Replacement Text for Section 7.7.1 Errata Management

Extension to 3 December Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-146

Issue-100 - proceeding with open exclusion periods

ISSUE-129 - coordination groups

Issue-129 Coordination Groups

Issue-140: The description of the Team in Section 2.2

Issue-144 Suggested updates to clarify Wide Review in Process2014

List created [Was: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]]

New list: "Identify work not destined for success" [Was: AB priorities, 2014/2015]

New list: Identify most important priorities for Web & W3C [Was: AB priorities, 2014/2015]

New list: W3C synchonization and consistency [Was: AB priorities 2014/2015]

Process Task Force Telcon on 18 November, 2014

Proposed list for all First/Final CG report announcements

Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules

proposed spec accessibility review questionnaire [first pass]

Require security review before FPWD

UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]

Update on the Process Document Task Force

Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]

w3process-ACTION-38: Propose a resolution for issue 141

w3process-ACTION-39: Talk to judy about using an existing group type, for example, member-only ig, to coordinate wai activity

w3process-ACTION-40: Look at simplifying coordination groups to meet judy's needs

w3process-ACTION-41: Propose text for the intent of the wide review section and to add liaisons to list of director considerations

w3process-ACTION-42: Send cfc on text proposed to fix the election process when a change of affliliation occurs

w3process-ACTION-43: Will confirm that all musts about the team would be covered by delegating from director

w3process-ISSUE-146 (cepc-does-not-override-local-laws): state the obvious: the policy does not and cannot override local laws and regulations, particularly those regarding employment [Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct]

w3process-ISSUE-147 (cepc-facilitate-collaborative-evolution): Put the CEPC document in a system that facilitates change requests and evolution of the document [Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct]

w3process-ISSUE-148 (Consider Liaisons): Consider Liaison when deciding who should review a REC Track document [Process Document]

w3process-ISSUE-149 (no-delegation): Are there things the director should not be able to delegate? [Process Document]

WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal

WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal and the discussion of Issue-141

Last message date: Friday, 28 November 2014 16:26:32 UTC