Re: w3process-ACTION-43: Will confirm that all musts about the team would be covered by delegating from director

On 11/26/2014 6:03 AM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:
> 26.11.2014, 04:50, "David Singer" <singer@mac.com>:
>> is it really true that he can delegate absolutely anything?  I would suggest that the power to delegate is not, for example, something that can be delegated…
> Hmm. I think the power to delegate things that can be delegated is reasonable to delegate.
>
> On the one hand, there is a problem if, for example, the director goes on sabbatical, a long holiday in a busy period, etc.

Is there ever a sabbatical from the web?

>
> On the other hand, Tim Berners-Lee is regularly presented by W3C as part of the value it offers, I think correctly. Which might imply that there are things that TimBL should not delegate - perhaps must not delegate. After all, there are very few things that happen in the standards process so rapidly that we coudn't wait a few extra weeks, or anticipate and have the director deal with before the deadline.
>
> I've raised ISSUE-149 on this question, and I think it is important to resolve so I request that we open it.
>
> cheers
>
> Chaals
>
>>>   On Nov 25, 2014, at 7:40 , Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>   w3process-ACTION-43: Will confirm that all musts about the team would be covered by delegating from director
>>>
>>>   http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/actions/43
>>>
>>>   Assigned to: Steve Zilles
>> Dave Singer
>>
>> singer@mac.com
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
>

Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2014 13:36:29 UTC