Re: Require security review before FPWD

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 12:27 PM, David Singer <> wrote:
> By the time the w3c indicates that something is implementable, i.e. that implementations
> start occurring and hence security/accessibility/privacy/i18nability issues actually hit people,
> we should be clear that the appropriate reviews have been done, not that they were done
> explicitly at FPWD or at any other particular named stage.

The W3C hasn't even decided yet to my knowledge whether it wants to
endorse DRM, yet various browsers implemented it. Again, this is not
how things work.


Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 11:31:08 UTC